DETERMINANTS OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC AORTIC ROOT SIZE - THE FRAMINGHAM HEART-STUDY

被引:260
作者
VASAN, RS
LARSON, MG
LEVY, D
机构
[1] FRAMINGHAM HEART DIS EPIDEMIOL STUDY,FRAMINGHAM,MA 01701
[2] BETH ISRAEL HOSP,DIV CARDIOL,BOSTON,MA
[3] BETH ISRAEL HOSP,DIV CLIN EPIDEMIOL,BOSTON,MA 02215
[4] BOSTON UNIV,SCH MED,BOSTON,MA 02118
[5] NHLBI,BETHESDA,MD 20892
关键词
AORTA; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; BLOOD PRESSURE;
D O I
10.1161/01.CIR.91.3.734
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Previous studies that evaluated the determinants of aortic root size have not yielded uniform results. We examined the relations of age, height, weight, body surface area, sex, and blood pressure to echocardiographically determined aortic root size in a population-based cohort. Methods and Results The study sample consisted of 1849 men and 2152 women in the Framingham Heart Study and Framingham Offspring Study who were Gee of clinically apparent cardiac disease when echocardiography was performed. Aortic root measurements were made by M-mode echocardiography using a leading-edge-to-leading-edge technique. The relations of age, height, weight, body surface area, and blood pressure variables (contemporary and those obtained 8 years before) to aortic root dimension were examined by use of sex-specific correlations and linear regression analyses. Age, height; weight, and sex emerged as the principal determinants of aortic root dimensions in adults (cumulative R(2)=.2085 in men and .2327 in women). The additional effect of contemporary or previous blood pressure measures was small and revealed direct associations of aortic root dimension with mean arterial and diastolic blood pressures and inverse associations with pulse and systolic blood pressures. Previous blood pressure measurements did not contribute significantly to prediction of aortic root size once contemporary blood pressure variables entered the models. Results of regression analyses using a sex-pooled data set showed that on average, the aortic root measurement in women was 2.4 mm smaller than that of men of comparable age, height, and weight. Logistic regression was used to assess the likelihood of aortic root enlargement according to blood pressure levels. After adjustment for age, height, and weight, the odds ratio of aortic dilation for a 1-SD increment in systolic pressure was 0.70 (95% CI, 0.52 to 0.95) in men and 0.79 (95% CI, 0.60 to 1.04) in women; the odds ratio for a 1-SD increment in diastolic pressure was 1.22 (95% CI, 0.91 to 1.63) in men and 1.33 (95% CI, 1.01 to 1.73) in women. Conclusions Age, height, weight, and sex emerged as the principal determinants of aortic root dimensions. The additional influences of blood pressure measurements were small; direct associations of aortic root dimensions with mean arterial and diastolic blood pressures and inverse associations with pulse and systolic blood pressures were observed. Additional prospective studies are needed to confirm these observations and to assess the impact of aortic root dimensions on the incidence of hypertension.
引用
收藏
页码:734 / 740
页数:7
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]  
ALTMAN DG, 1991, PRACTICAL STATISTICS, P318
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1951, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH
[3]  
ARCARO G, 1991, J HYPERTENS, V9, P947
[4]  
ARONBERG DJ, 1984, J COMPUT ASSIST TOMO, V8, P247
[5]   DEPENDENCE OF WALL STRESS IN HUMAN THORACIC AORTA ON AGE AND PRESSURE [J].
BADER, H .
CIRCULATION RESEARCH, 1967, 20 (03) :354-&
[6]   IS PULSE PRESSURE A STIMULUS FOR ALTERED VASCULAR STRUCTURE IN CHRONIC HYPERTENSION [J].
BAUMBACH, GL .
HYPERTENSION, 1991, 18 (06) :728-729
[7]   AORTIC ROOT DILATATION AND MITRAL-VALVE PROLAPSE IN MARFANS-SYNDROME - ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC STUDY [J].
BROWN, OR ;
DEMOTS, H ;
KLOSTER, FE ;
ROBERTS, A ;
MENASHE, VD ;
BEALS, RK .
CIRCULATION, 1975, 52 (04) :651-657
[8]   REDUCING PULSE PRESSURE IN HYPERTENSION MAY NORMALIZE SMALL ARTERY STRUCTURE [J].
CHRISTENSEN, KL .
HYPERTENSION, 1991, 18 (06) :722-727
[9]  
Davies MJ, 1980, PATHOLOGY CARDIAC VA, P37
[10]   A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight be known [J].
Du Bois, D ;
Du Bois, EF .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1916, 17 (06) :863-871