DOES URETHRAL INSTRUMENTATION AFFECT UROFLOWMETRY MEASUREMENTS

被引：11

作者：

TESSIER, J ^{[1
]}

SCHICK, E ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] HOP MAISON NEUVE ROSEMONT, DEPT SURG, DIV UROL, 5415 BLVD ASSOMPT, MONTREAL H1T 2M4, QUEBEC, CANADA

来源：

BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 1990年 / 65卷 / 03期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1111/j.1464-410X.1990.tb14722.x

中图分类号：

R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学（泌尿生殖系疾病）];

学科分类号：

1002 ; 100201 ;

摘要：

Summary— Uroflowmetry was performed before and after urethral catheterisation in 129 patients. Uroflowmetry measurements were significantly modified by urethral instrumentation. In males, both maximum and mean flow rates decreased following urethral catheterisation, while in females only the maximum flow rate decreased, the mean flow rate remaining unchanged. Voided volume increased (and consequently resdidual urine decreased) in females after catheterisation, but did not change significantly in males. False positive results were encountered in 32% of patients and false negative results in 11% when flowmetry was done immediately after catheterisation. Uroflowmetry after urethral instrumentation is not recommended. © 1990 British Journal of Urology

引用

页码：261 / 263

页数：3

共 8 条

[1] GEORGE NJR, 1981, 11TH P ANN M INT CON, P67
[2] GEORGE NJR, 1986, OBSTRUCTIVE UROPATHY, P235
[3] LIEF M, 1984, Neurourology and Urodynamics, V3, P179, DOI 10.1002/nau.1930030307
[4] THE USE OF URINARY FLOW-RATES OBTAINED FROM VOIDED VOLUMES LESS THAN 150 ML IN THE ASSESSMENT OF VOIDING ABILITY
MARSHALL, VR
RYALL, RL
AUSTIN, ML
SINCLAIR, GR
[J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1983, 55 (01): : 28 - 33
[5] NORDLING J, 1981, 11TH P ANN M INT CON, P65
[6] NORMAL PEAK URINARY FLOW-RATES OBTAINED FROM SMALL VOIDED VOLUMES CAN PROVIDE A RELIABLE ASSESSMENT OF BLADDER FUNCTION
RYALL, RL
MARSHALL, VR
[J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1982, 127 (03) : 484 - 488
[7] FLOW-RATE NOMOGRAM .1. DEVELOPMENT
SIROKY, MB
OLSSON, CA
KRANE, RJ
[J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1979, 122 (05) : 665 - 668
[8] FLOW-RATE NOMOGRAM .2. CLINICAL CORRELATION
SIROKY, MB
OLSSON, CA
KRANE, RJ
[J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1980, 123 (02) : 208 - 210

← 1 →