THE CLINICAL-TRIAL

[1] ANISH DS, 1980, CLIN RES, V28, pA540

[2] [Anonymous], 1948, Br Med J, V2, P769

[3] ARE RANDOMIZED TRIALS APPROPRIATE FOR EVALUATING NEW OPERATIONS [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1979, 301 (01) : 44 - 45

[4] CHALMERS TC, 1974, MT SINAI J MED, V41, P753

[5] RANDOMIZATION OF 1ST PATIENT [J]. MEDICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1975, 59 (04) : 1035 - 1038

[6] HISTORICAL VERSUS RANDOMIZED CONTROLS FOR CLINICAL-TRIALS [J]. CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1980, 1 (02): : 177 - 177

[7] CHALMERS TC, 1976, ETHICAL SAFEGUARDS R, P119

[8] UNIVERSITY GROUP DIABETES PROGRAM - FURTHER STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF MORTALITY FINDINGS [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1971, 217 (12) : 1676 - +

[9] CROUT JR, 1977, NOV ANN M ASS MIL SU

[10] Fisher R.A., 1935, DESIGN EXPT

[1] ANISH DS, 1980, CLIN RES, V28, pA540

[2] [Anonymous], 1948, Br Med J, V2, P769

[3] ARE RANDOMIZED TRIALS APPROPRIATE FOR EVALUATING NEW OPERATIONS [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1979, 301 (01) : 44 - 45

[4] CHALMERS TC, 1974, MT SINAI J MED, V41, P753

[5] RANDOMIZATION OF 1ST PATIENT [J]. MEDICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1975, 59 (04) : 1035 - 1038

[6] HISTORICAL VERSUS RANDOMIZED CONTROLS FOR CLINICAL-TRIALS [J]. CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1980, 1 (02): : 177 - 177

[7] CHALMERS TC, 1976, ETHICAL SAFEGUARDS R, P119

[8] UNIVERSITY GROUP DIABETES PROGRAM - FURTHER STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF MORTALITY FINDINGS [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1971, 217 (12) : 1676 - +

[9] CROUT JR, 1977, NOV ANN M ASS MIL SU

[10] Fisher R.A., 1935, DESIGN EXPT