CONFIDENCE-INTERVALS ON STRATIGRAPHIC RANGES

被引:256
作者
MARSHALL, CR
机构
[1] UNIV CHICAGO,DEPT GEOPHYS SCI,CHICAGO,IL 60637
[2] UNIV CHICAGO,COMM EVOLUTIONARY BIOL,CHICAGO,IL 60637
关键词
D O I
10.1017/S0094837300009672
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Observed stratigraphie ranges almost always underestimate true longevities. Strauss and Sadler (1987, 1989) provide a method for calculating confidence intervals on the endpoints of local stratigraphie ranges. Their method can also be applied to composite sections; confidence intervals may be placed on times of origin and extinction for entire species or lineages. Confidence interval sizes depend only on the length of the stratigraphie range and the number of fossil horizons. The technique’s most important assumptions are that fossil horizons are distributed randomly and that collecting intensity has been uniform over the stratigraphie range. These assumptions are more difficult to test and less likely to be fulfilled for composite sections than for local sections. Confidence intervals give useful baseline estimates of the incompleteness of the fossil record, even if the underlying assumptions cannot be tested. Confidence intervals, which can be very large, should be calculated when the fossil record is used to assess absolute rates of molecular or morphological evolution, especially for poorly preserved groups. Confidence intervals have other functions: to determine how rich the fossil record has to be before radiometric dating errors become the dominant source of error in estimated times of origin or extinction; to predict future fossil finds; to predict which species with fossil records should be extant; and to assess phylogenetic hypotheses and taxonomic assignments. © 1990, Paleontological Society. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 10
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   1ST MESOZOIC MAMMAL FROM AUSTRALIA - AN EARLY CRETACEOUS MONOTREME [J].
ARCHER, M ;
FLANNERY, TF ;
RITCHIE, A ;
MOLNAR, RE .
NATURE, 1985, 318 (6044) :363-366
[2]  
ARCHER M, 1986, UNCOVERING AUSTR DRE
[3]   Tertiary mammals of Australia: a synoptic review [J].
Archer, Michael ;
Bartholomai, Alan .
ALCHERINGA, 1978, 2 (01) :1-19
[4]  
Barrowclough G.F., 1983, P223, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511759994.009
[5]   MOLECULAR EVOLUTION IN DROSOPHILA AND THE HIGHER DIPTERA .2. A TIME SCALE FOR FLY EVOLUTION [J].
BEVERLEY, SM ;
WILSON, AC .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR EVOLUTION, 1984, 21 (01) :1-13
[6]   RATES OF DNA-SEQUENCE EVOLUTION DIFFER BETWEEN TAXONOMIC GROUPS [J].
BRITTEN, RJ .
SCIENCE, 1986, 231 (4744) :1393-1398
[8]  
Harland W. B., 1982, GEOLOGIC TIME SCALE
[9]   UNUSUAL EVOLUTIONARY CONSERVATION AND FREQUENT DNA SEGMENT EXCHANGE IN CLASS-I GENES OF THE MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY COMPLEX [J].
HAYASHIDA, H ;
MIYATA, T .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1983, 80 (09) :2671-2675
[10]   RATES OF NUCLEAR-DNA EVOLUTION IN PHEASANT-LIKE BIRDS - EVIDENCE FROM RESTRICTION MAPS [J].
HELMBYCHOWSKI, KM ;
WILSON, AC .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1986, 83 (03) :688-692