VESSEL ENHANCEMENT FILTERING IN 3-DIMENSIONAL MR-ANGIOGRAPHY

被引:11
作者
DU, YP [1 ]
PARKER, DL [1 ]
DAVIS, WL [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV UTAH,DEPT PHYS,SALT LAKE CITY,UT 84112
来源
JMRI-JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING | 1995年 / 5卷 / 02期
关键词
CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE FILTERING; IMAGE PROCESSING; VASCULAR STUDIES;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.1880050207
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
For a variety of reasons, small vessels have low signal intensity in magnetic resonance angiography. When the vessel signal intensity is lower than the signal intensity of background tissues, these vessels tend not to be visible on maximum-intensity-projection images. The authors developed a nonlinear second-difference spatial filtering technique that enhances the details of small vessels while suppressing both noise and uniform background tissue. Two similar nonlinear second-difference filters are presented and compared with the linear Laplacian second-difference filter. To evaluate the performance of these Filters, they were applied to intracranial three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiographic data and the results compared with the vessel enhancement obtained with a simple second-difference Laplacian filter and with magnetization transfer contrast (MTC) techniques. The comparisons demonstrated that nonlinear filtering and MTC techniques result in similar improvement in small-vessel visibility and apparent continuity, A quantitative comparison demonstrated that the improvement in the contrast-to-noise ratio is much greater with the nonlinear filters than the Laplacian filter.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 157
页数:7
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] Anderson CM, Saloner D, Tsuruda JS, Shapeero LG, Lee RE, Artifacts in maximum‐intensity‐projection display of MR angiograms, AJR, 154, pp. 623-629, (1990)
  • [2] Brown DG, Riederer SJ, Contrast‐to‐noise ratios in maximum intensity projection images, Magn Reson Med, 23, pp. 130-137, (1992)
  • [3] Edelman RR, Ann SS, Chien D, Et al., Improved time‐to‐ flight MR angfography of the brain with magnetization transfer contrast, Radiology, 184, pp. 395-399, (1992)
  • [4] Lin W, Tkach JA, Haacke EM, Masaryk TJ, Intracranial MR angiography: application of magnetization transfer contrast and fat saturation to short gradient‐echo, velocity‐ompensated sequences, Radiology, 186, pp. 753-761, (1993)
  • [5] Pike B, Hu BS, Glover GH, Enzmann DR, Magnetization transfer time‐of‐flight magnetic resonance angiography, Magn Reson Med, 25, pp. 372-379, (1992)
  • [6] Schneider E, Prost RW, Glover GH, Pulsed magnetization transfer versus continuous wave irradiation for tissue contrast enhancement, JMRI, 3, pp. 417-423, (1993)
  • [7] Pratt WK, Digital image processing, (1991)
  • [8] Henkelman RM, Measurement of signal intensities in the presence of noise in MR Images, Med Phys, 12, pp. 232-233, (1985)
  • [9] Du YP, Parker DL, Davis WL, Cao G
  • [10] Du YP, Parker DL, Davis WL, Blatter DD, Contrast‐to‐noise ratio measurements in 3D MR angiography, Invest Radiol, 28, pp. 1004-1009, (1993)