COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE INVITRO AND INVIVO OF LUNAR DPX AND HOLOGIC QDR-1000 DUAL ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETERS

被引:104
作者
LASKEY, MA
FLAXMAN, ME
BARBER, RW
TRAFFORD, S
HAYBALL, MP
LYTTLE, KD
CRISP, AJ
COMPSTON, JE
机构
[1] ADDENBROOKES HOSP, DEPT RHEUMATOL, CAMBRIDGE CB2 2QQ, ENGLAND
[2] UNIV CAMBRIDGE, ADDENBROOKES HOSP, CLIN SCH, DEPT MED, CAMBRIDGE CB2 2QQ, ENGLAND
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
DUAL-ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; LUNAR DPX; HOLOGIC QDR-1000;
D O I
10.1259/0007-1285-64-767-1023
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100207 [影像医学与核医学]; 1009 [特种医学];
摘要
The measured absolute bone mineral density values of spine and femur and their precision were compared on two dual energy X-ray absorptiometers, the Lunar DPX and the Hologic QDR-1000. There were systematic differences between the two systems, the Lunar DPX always giving a higher bone density value. The ratio of the mean Lunar DPX/Hologic QDR-1000 bone density measurements obtained in vivo was 1.13 g/cm2 for spine (L2-L4) and 1.20-1.43 g/cm2 for femur measurements. For both systems, short- and long-term precision (coefficient of variation) was below 0.5% for spine in vitro measurements and below 1.5% for neck of femur in vitro measurements. Precision of in vivo measurements was less good, especially for femur measurements. The coefficient of variation of spine measurements was dependent on bone density and deteriorated with decreased bone mineral density and increased body thickness.
引用
收藏
页码:1023 / 1029
页数:7
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[2]
A THEORETICAL-ANALYSIS OF THE ACCURACY OF SINGLE-ENERGY CT BONE-MINERAL MEASUREMENTS [J].
CRAWLEY, EO ;
EVANS, WD ;
OWEN, GM .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1988, 33 (10) :1113-1127
[3]
X-RAY DUAL-PHOTON ABSORPTIOMETRY - A NEW METHOD FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF BONE-DENSITY [J].
CULLUM, ID ;
ELL, PJ ;
RYDER, JP .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1989, 62 (739) :587-592
[4]
DUAL-ENERGY RADIOGRAPHIC ABSORPTIOMETRY OF THE LUMBAR SPINE - CLINICAL-EXPERIENCE WITH 2 DIFFERENT SYSTEMS [J].
GUNDRY, CR ;
MILLER, CW ;
RAMOS, E ;
MOSCONA, A ;
STEIN, JA ;
MAZESS, RB ;
SARTORIS, DJ ;
RESNICK, D .
RADIOLOGY, 1990, 174 (02) :539-541
[5]
ICRP, 1977, ICRP PUBL, V26, P1383
[6]
Jennings W A, 1983, Br J Radiol Suppl, V17, P1
[7]
QUANTITATIVE DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY VERSUS DUAL PHOTON-ABSORPTIOMETRY OF THE LUMBAR SPINE [J].
KELLY, TL ;
SLOVIK, DM ;
SCHOENFELD, DA ;
NEER, RM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 1988, 67 (04) :839-844
[8]
INFLUENCE OF VERTEBRAL FAT-CONTENT ON QUANTITATIVE CT DENSITY [J].
LAVALJEANTET, AM ;
ROGER, B ;
BOUYSSE, S ;
BERGOT, C ;
MAZESS, RB .
RADIOLOGY, 1986, 159 (02) :463-466
[9]
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF A DUAL-ENERGY X-RAY BONE DENSITOMETER [J].
MAZESS, R ;
COLLICK, B ;
TREMPE, J ;
BARDEN, H ;
HANSON, J .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 1989, 44 (03) :228-232
[10]
MAZESS RB, 1989, P SOC EXP BIOL MED, V191, P261