MODAL ECTHESIS

被引:2
作者
JOHNSON, F
机构
[1] Philosophy Department, Colorado State University, Ford Collins, CO
关键词
D O I
10.1080/01445349308837216
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
My semantics for McCall's syntactic presentation of Aristotle's assertoric and apodeictic syllogistic is altered to free it from Thom's objections that it is unAristotelian. The altered semantics rejects Baroco-XLL and Bocardo-LXL, which Thom says Aristotle should have accepted. Aristotle's proofs that use ecthesis are formalized by using singular sentences. With one exception the (acceptance) axioms for McCall's system L-X-M are derivable. Formal proofs are shown to be sound.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 182
页数:12
相关论文
共 7 条
[1]  
Jeffrey R., 1991, FORMAL LOGIC ITS SCO, V3
[2]  
JOHNSON F., 1989, NOTRE DAME J FORM L, V30, P271, DOI DOI 10.1305/NDJFL/1093635084
[3]  
Johnson F., 1991, STUDIA LOGICA, V50, P181, DOI 10.1007/BF00370181
[4]  
McCall Storrs, 1963, ARISTOTLES MODAL SYL
[5]  
Ross William David, 1957, ARISTOTLES PRIOR POS
[6]  
Smith R., 1989, ARISTOTLE PRIOR ANAL
[7]  
Thom P., 1991, HIST PHILOS LOGIC, V12, P135