THE USE OF SELF-MEASURED BLOOD-PRESSURE DETERMINATIONS IN ASSESSING DYNAMICS OF DRUG COMPLIANCE IN A STUDY WITH AMLODIPINE ONCE-A-DAY, MORNING VERSUS EVENING

被引:89
作者
MENGDEN, T [1 ]
BINSWANGER, B [1 ]
SPUHLER, T [1 ]
WEISSER, B [1 ]
VETTER, W [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV HOSP ZURICH,DEPT INTERNAL MED,CH-8091 ZURICH,SWITZERLAND
关键词
CALCIUM ANTAGONIST; ANTIHYPERTENSIVE EFFICACY; COMPLIANCE; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING; SELF-MEASUREMENT; AMBULATORY BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT;
D O I
10.1097/00004872-199312000-00013
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Objective: To test whether the time of administration influences the therapeutic response to a calcium antagonist taken once a day. Also, the dynamics of drug compliance and its impact on blood pressure control were investigated. Design: Twenty outpatients with mild-to-moderate hypertension were included in a randomized, placebo-controlled open study. In a crossover design, all of the patients received 5 mg amlodipine, either in the morning or in the evening, during two consecutive 4-week treatment periods. Methods: Blood pressure was taken by casual measurement, ambulatory 24-h monitoring (SpaceLabs 90202) and self-measurement at home, performed with a semi-automatic oscillometric device during the whole study period. Compliance was assessed using the Medication-Event-Monitoring System (MEMS). Results: Neither casual nor ambulatory day- or night-time readings detected a significant difference between morning and evening administration. However, self-measurement documented significantly greater blood pressure reductions for morning than for evening administration. The MEMS showed different compliance on the days of ambulatory monitoring (100% with both drug regimens) compared with the whole treatment period. The number of days with missed medication was thus significantly higher for the evening dosing regimen. The difference in self-measured blood pressure between the two regimens was lost if the days with missed medication were removed from the statistical analysis. Conclusions: Time of once-a-day amlodipine administration does not influence its efficacy for 24-h blood pressure control. Furthermore, the use of self-measurement and the MEMS may provide useful additional information on the pharmacodynamic impact of different dosing patterns in hypertensive patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1403 / 1411
页数:9
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
AGNOLI A, 1975, REV NEUROL, V131, P597
[2]  
Anlauf M, 1992, Schweiz Rundsch Med Prax, V81, P106
[3]  
AYMAN DAVID, 1940, AMER JOUR MED SCI, V200, P465, DOI 10.1097/00000441-194010000-00005
[4]   DRUG-THERAPY - PATIENT COMPLIANCE [J].
BLACKWELL, B .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1973, 289 (05) :249-+
[5]  
BROWN GE, 1930, ANN INTERN MED, V3, P177
[6]  
CONWAY J, 1990, J HYPERTENS, V8, pS83
[7]   USEFULNESS OF HOME BP DETERMINATION IN TREATING BORDERLINE HYPERTENSION [J].
COTTIER, C ;
JULIUS, S ;
GAJENDRAGADKAR, SV ;
SCHORK, MA .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1982, 248 (05) :555-558
[8]   COMPLIANCE DECLINES BETWEEN CLINIC VISITS [J].
CRAMER, JA ;
SCHEYER, RD ;
MATTSON, RH .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1990, 150 (07) :1509-1510
[9]   MULTICENTER PLACEBO-CONTROLLED COMPARISON OF AMLODIPINE AND ATENOLOL IN MILD TO MODERATE HYPERTENSION [J].
DEBRUIJN, B ;
COCCO, G ;
TYLER, HM .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR PHARMACOLOGY, 1988, 12 :S107-S109
[10]  
EDMONDS D, 1985, J HYPERTENS, V3, P31