RISK OF RESIDUAL RECTAL MUCOSA AFTER PROCTOCOLECTOMY AND ILEAL POUCH-ANAL RECONSTRUCTION WITH THE DOUBLE-STAPLING TECHNIQUE - POSTOPERATIVE ENDOSCOPIC FOLLOW-UP-STUDY

PURPOSE: This study was designed to assess the risk of retained rectal mucosa after proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis with the double-stapling technique. METHODS: A total of 113 patients underwent proctocolectomy with an ileal pouch-anal reconstruction. In 57 patients the anastomosis between pouch and proximal anal canal was performed using the double-stapling technique. In 26 patients the procedure was carried out without a protecting ileostomy. Of the remaining 31 patients with a proximal ileostomy, 15 underwent endoscopy six weeks postoperatively. Circular biopsies were taken just distal from the pouch-anal anastomosis. RESULTS: Histologic examination revealed rectal mucosa in at least one biopsy in 7 of 15 patients. At follow-up (mean 18 months) no (distal) pouchitis was clinically noticed. In one patient with familial pouchitis, a few polyps, distal of the anastomosis, had to be endoscopically removed. CONCLUSIONS. Double-stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis has a considerable risk of residual rectal mucosa, because of combined linear transection and circular stapling with bilateral dog-ear formation of rectal mucosa. Residual rectal mucosa did not seem to influence clinical results at follow-up.