DETERMINING THE IMPACT OF SEX PREFERENCES ON FERTILITY - CONSIDERATION OF PARITY PROGRESSION RATIO, DOMINANCE, AND STOPPING RULE MEASURES

被引：42

作者：

MCCLELLAND, GH ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] UNIV COLORADO,INST BEHAV SCI,BOULDER,CO 80309

来源：

DEMOGRAPHY | 1979年 / 16卷 / 03期

关键词：

D O I：

10.2307/2061219

中图分类号：

C921 [人口统计学];

学科分类号：

摘要：

The two methods commonly used to assess the effect of sex preferences on fertility are inadequate to the task. Parity progression ratio analyses suffer from logical problems stemming from the heterogeneity of sex preferences and the riskiness of fertility decisions. While conjoint measurement-dominance procedures overcome these logical problems, they cannot yield quantitative estimates of the impact of sex preferences on fertility. A stopping rule measure which overcomes these limitations is proposed and described and its potential for determining the effect of sex predetermination methods on population is discussed. © 1979 Population Association of America.

引用

页码：377 / 388

页数：12

共 18 条

[1] DO SEX PREFERENCES REALLY MATTER
BENPORATH, Y
WELCH, F
[J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1976, 90 (02) : 285 - 307
[2] PREFERENCE SCALES FOR NUMBER AND SEX OF CHILDREN
COOMBS, CH
COOMBS, LC
MCCLELLAND, GH
[J]. POPULATION STUDIES-A JOURNAL OF DEMOGRAPHY, 1975, 29 (02): : 273 - 298
[3] Coombs Clyde H., 1964, THEORY DATA
[4] COOMBS LC, 1978, POP STUD-J DEMOG, V32, P43, DOI 10.1080/00324728.1978.10412791
[5] COOMBS LC, 1976, IUSSP5 PAP
[6] GENDER PREFERENCES, SEX PREDETERMINATION, AND FAMILY-SIZE IN UNITED-STATES
CUTRIGHT, P
BELT, S
SCANZONI, J
[J]. SOCIAL BIOLOGY, 1974, 21 (03): : 242 - 248
[7] DAWES RM, 1970, OREGON RES B, V10
[8] Flanagan JC, 1942, GENET PSYCHOL MONOGR, V25, P3
[9] SOME POSSIBLE EFFECTS OF BIRTH CONTROL ON HUMAN SEX RATIO
GOODMAN, LA
[J]. ANNALS OF HUMAN GENETICS, 1961, 25 (01) : 75 - +
[10] KRANTZ DH, 1971, F MEASUREMENT, V1

← 1 2 →