BUFFER THERAPY DURING OUT-OF-HOSPITAL CARDIOPULMONARY-RESUSCITATION

被引:106
作者
DYBVIK, T [1 ]
STRAND, T [1 ]
STEEN, PA [1 ]
机构
[1] ULLEVAL HOSP,DEPT ANAESTHESIOL,N-0407 OSLO,NORWAY
关键词
ACIDOSIS; BUFFERS; HEART ARREST; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; RESUSCITATION;
D O I
10.1016/0300-9572(95)00850-S
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
The effects of infusing a buffer solution on resuscitability and outcome was tested in patients during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. A number (502) of adults with asystole or ventricular fibrillation with failure of first defibrilliation attempt were entered into a prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Of these, 245 patients received 250 mi of a sodium bicarbonate-trometamol-phosphate mixture with buffering capacity 500 mmol/l and 257 patients received 250 mi 0.9% saline. Except for the investigational infusion, all patients were resuscitated according to international guidelines. Eighty-seven patients (36%) receiving buffer were admitted to hospital ICU and 24 (10%) were discharged from hospital alive, vs. 92 (36%) and 35 (14%) receiving saline (95% confidence interval (CI) for difference between groups: -6%-6% for rate of admission and -1%-9% for rate of discharge). Using a logistic regression analysis, ventricular fibrillation as initial rhythm (odds ratio 8.06, CI 3.70-17.56) improved the outcome, whereas buffer therapy had no effect (odds ratio 0.77, CI 0.43-1.41). Mean base excess at hospital admission was -9 after Tribonat vs. -11 after saline (P = 0.04, CI for difference 0.2-3.8), Only 16 of the 502 patients had arterial alkalosis on arrival in the hospital and no patient had a positive base excess. Patients resuscitated after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest had metabolic acidosis, but buffer therapy did not improve the outcome.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 95
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Koster, Carli, Acid-base management, A statement for the advanced life support working party of the European Resuscitation Council, 24, pp. 143-146, (1992)
[2]  
Guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiac care, JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 268, pp. 2171-2295, (1992)
[3]  
von Planta, Bar-Joseph, Wiklund, Bircher, Falk, Abramson, Pathophysiologic and therapeutic implications of acid-base changes during CPR, Ann Emerg Med, 22, pp. 404-410, (1993)
[4]  
Standards for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and emergency cardiac care (ECC), J Am Med Assoc, 227, pp. 833-868, (1974)
[5]  
Standards and guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and emergency cardiac care (ECC), JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 255, pp. 2905-2984, (1986)
[6]  
Advanced Life Support Working Party of the European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for advanced life support, Resuscitation, 24, pp. 111-121, (1992)
[7]  
Weil, Rackow, Trevino, Grundler, Falk, Griffel, Differences in acid-base state between venous and arterial blood during cardiopulmonary resuscitation, N Engl J Med, 315, pp. 153-156, (1986)
[8]  
Kette, Weil, Gazmuri, Buffer solutions may compromise cardiac resuscitation by reducing coronary perfusion pressure, J Am Med Assoc, 266, pp. 2121-2126, (1991)
[9]  
von Planta, Gudipati, Weil, Kraus, Rackow, Effects of tromethamine and sodium bicarbonate buffers during cardiac resuscitation, J Clin Pharmacol, 28, pp. 594-599, (1988)
[10]  
Guerci, Chandra, Johnson, Rayburn, Wurmb, Tsitlik, Et al., Failure of sodium bicarbonate to improve resuscitation from ventricular fibrillation in dogs, Circulation, 74, pp. 75-79, (1986)