HYALURONATE CAN FUNCTION AS A CELL-ADHESION MOLECULE AND CD44 PARTICIPATES IN HYALURONATE RECOGNITION

被引:631
作者
MIYAKE, K
UNDERHILL, CB
LESLEY, J
KINCADE, PW
机构
[1] OKLAHOMA MED RES FDN,IMMUNOBIOL & CANC PROGRAM,825 NE 13TH,OKLAHOMA CITY,OK 73104
[2] SALK INST BIOL STUDIES,DEPT CANC BIOL,SAN DIEGO,CA 92138
[3] GEORGETOWN UNIV,MED CTR,DEPT ANAT & CELL BIOL,WASHINGTON,DC 20007
关键词
D O I
10.1084/jem.172.1.69
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
A cell adhesion model was previously used to select a series of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), which were subsequently found to recognize CD44/Pgp-1. Interest in these reagents increased with the finding that they totally inhibited production of lymphoid or myeloid cells in long-term bone marrow cultures. Further investigation has now revealed that hyaluronate is a potential ligand for CD44 and that hyaluronate recognition accounts for the adhesion between B lineage hybridoma and stromal cells. The hybridoma cells adhered to hyaluronate-coated plastic wells as well as to monolayers of stromal cells. The adhesion in both cases was inhibited by treatment with hyaluronidases, and did not require divalent cations. Addition of exogenous hyaluronate also diminished binding of lymphoid cells to stromal cells. One of several mAbs to Pgp-1/CD44 was particularly effective at blocking these interactions. Since hyaluronate and Pgp-1/CD44 were present on both cell types, experiments were done to determine the cellular location ofinteracting molecules required for the adhesion process. Treatment oflymphoid cells with an anti-Pgp-1/CD44 antibody was more inhibitory than antibody treatment ofthe stromal cells. Conversely, hyaluronidase treatment of stromal cells reduced subsequent binding more than treatment of the lymphoid cells. Adhesive interactions that involve hyaluronate and CD44 could contribute to a number of cell recognition processes, including ones required for normal lympho-hemopoiesis. © 1990, Rockefeller University Press., All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 75
页数:7
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] THE HYALURONATE RECEPTOR IS PREFERENTIALLY EXPRESSED ON PROLIFERATING EPITHELIAL-CELLS
    ALHO, AM
    UNDERHILL, CB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY, 1989, 108 (04) : 1557 - 1565
  • [2] LYMPHOID PRECURSOR CELLS ADHERE TO 2 DIFFERENT SITES ON FIBRONECTIN
    BERNARDI, P
    PATEL, VP
    LODISH, HF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY, 1987, 105 (01) : 489 - 498
  • [3] HAEMONECTIN, A BONE-MARROW ADHESION PROTEIN-SPECIFIC FOR CELLS OF GRANULOCYTE LINEAGE
    CAMPBELL, AD
    LONG, MW
    WICHA, MS
    [J]. NATURE, 1987, 329 (6141) : 744 - 746
  • [4] NEURONAL CELL CELL-ADHESION DEPENDS ON INTERACTIONS OF N-CAM WITH HEPARIN-LIKE MOLECULES
    COLE, GJ
    LOEWY, A
    GLASER, L
    [J]. NATURE, 1986, 320 (6061) : 445 - 447
  • [5] MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODY TO A HUMAN BRAIN-GRANULOCYTE-T LYMPHOCYTE ANTIGEN PROBABLY HOMOLOGOUS TO THE W 3-13 ANTIGEN OF THE RAT
    DALCHAU, R
    KIRKLEY, J
    FABRE, JW
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY, 1980, 10 (10) : 745 - 749
  • [6] IMMUNOGENICITY OF LIPOSOME-BOUND HYALURONATE IN MICE - AT LEAST 2 DIFFERENT ANTIGENIC SITES ON HYALURONATE ARE IDENTIFIED BY MOUSE MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODIES
    FILLIT, HM
    BLAKE, M
    MACDONALD, C
    MCCARTY, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 1988, 168 (03) : 971 - 982
  • [7] FLANAGAN BF, 1989, IMMUNOLOGY, V67, P167
  • [8] STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY BETWEEN LYMPHOCYTE RECEPTORS FOR HIGH ENDOTHELIUM AND CLASS-III EXTRACELLULAR-MATRIX RECEPTOR
    GALLATIN, WM
    WAYNER, EA
    HOFFMAN, PA
    STJOHN, T
    BUTCHER, EC
    CARTER, WG
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1989, 86 (12) : 4654 - 4658
  • [9] GIMBLE JM, 1989, BLOOD, V74, P303
  • [10] ADIPOGENESIS IN A MURINE BONE-MARROW STROMAL CELL-LINE CAPABLE OF SUPPORTING B-LINEAGE LYMPHOCYTE GROWTH AND PROLIFERATION - BIOCHEMICAL AND MOLECULAR CHARACTERIZATION
    GIMBLE, JM
    DORHEIM, MA
    CHENG, Q
    MEDINA, K
    WANG, CS
    JONES, R
    KOREN, E
    PIETRANGELI, C
    KINCADE, PW
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY, 1990, 20 (02) : 379 - 387