CHOLECYSTOKININ DEPOLARIZES RAT THALAMIC RETICULAR NEURONS BY SUPPRESSING A K+ CONDUCTANCE

被引:71
作者
COX, CL
HUGUENARD, JR
PRINCE, DA
机构
[1] Neurology/Neurological Sci. Dept., Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford
关键词
D O I
10.1152/jn.1995.74.3.990
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
1. The thalamic reticular nucleus (nRt) is innervated by cholecystokinin (CCK)-containing neurons and contains CCK binding sites. We used tight-seal, whole cell recording techniques with in vitro rat thalamic slices to investigate the action of CCK on neurons in nRt and ventrobasal thalamus (VB). 2. Brief applications of the CCK agonist cholecystokinin octapeptide (26-33) sulfated (CCK8S) evoked prolonged spike discharges in nRt neurons but had no direct effects on VB neuron activity. This selective excitatory action of CCK8S in nRt resulted from a long-lasting membrane depolarization (2-10 min) associated with an increased input resistance. Voltage-clamp recordings revealed that CCK8S reduced membrane conductance by 0.6-3.8 nS, which amounted to 5-54% of the resting conductance of these neurons. 3. The conductance blocked by CCK8S was linear over the range of -50 to -100 mV and reversed near the potassium equilibrium potential. Modifications of extracellular K+ concentration altered the reversal potential of the conductance as predicted by the Nernst equation. The K+ channel blocker Cs+, applied either intracellularly or combined intra- and extracellularly, blocked the response to CCK8S. 4. The CCK8S-induced depolarization persisted after suppression of synaptic transmission by either tetrodotoxin or a low-Ca2+, high-Mg2+ extracellular solution, indicating that the depolarization was primarily due to activation of postsynaptic CCK receptors and not mediated through the release of other neurotransmitters. 5. The selective CCKA antagonists L364,718 and Cam-1481 attenuated the CCK8S-induced depolarization, whereas the CCKB antagonist L365,260 had little or no effect on the depolarization. 6. Our findings indicate that CCK8S, acting via CCKA-type receptors, reduces a K+ leak current, resulting in a long-lasting membrane depolarization that can presumably modify the firing mode of nRt neurons. Through this effect, CCK actions in nRt may strongly influence thalamocortical function.
引用
收藏
页码:990 / 1000
页数:11
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   CHOLECYSTOKININ-INDUCED ACTIVITY CHANGES OF DORSAL LATERAL GENICULATE NEURONS IN RATS [J].
ALBRECHT, D ;
MULLER, R ;
ZIPPEL, U ;
GABRIEL, HJ ;
HENKLEIN, P ;
DAVIDOWA, H .
NEUROSCIENCE, 1994, 59 (04) :953-960
[2]   NEUROPEPTIDE-Y DISTRIBUTION IN THE RAT-BRAIN [J].
ALLEN, YS ;
ADRIAN, TE ;
ALLEN, JM ;
TATEMOTO, K ;
CROW, TJ ;
BLOOM, SR ;
POLAK, JM .
SCIENCE, 1983, 221 (4613) :877-879
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1985, THALAMUS
[4]   MECHANISMS OF OSCILLATORY ACTIVITY IN GUINEA-PIG NUCLEUS-RETICULARIS THALAMI IN-VITRO - A MAMMALIAN PACEMAKER [J].
BAL, T ;
MCCORMICK, DA .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1993, 468 :669-691
[5]   REGULATION OF THE RELEASE OF COEXISTING NEUROTRANSMITTERS [J].
BARTFAI, T ;
IVERFELDT, K ;
FISONE, G ;
SERFOZO, P .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PHARMACOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY, 1988, 28 :285-310
[6]   DEVELOPMENTAL EXPRESSION OF SOMATOSTATIN IN MOUSE-BRAIN .2. INSITU HYBRIDIZATION [J].
BENDOTTI, C ;
HOHMANN, C ;
FORLONI, G ;
REEVES, R ;
COYLE, JT ;
OSTERGRANITE, ML .
DEVELOPMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 1990, 53 (01) :26-39
[7]   WHOLE CELL RECORDING FROM NEURONS IN SLICES OF REPTILIAN AND MAMMALIAN CEREBRAL-CORTEX [J].
BLANTON, MG ;
LOTURCO, JJ ;
KRIEGSTEIN, AR .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS, 1989, 30 (03) :203-210
[8]   EFFECTS OF CHOLECYSTOKININ AND PENTAGASTRIN ON RAT HIPPOCAMPAL-NEURONS MAINTAINED INVITRO [J].
BODEN, PR ;
HILL, RG .
NEUROPEPTIDES, 1988, 12 (02) :95-103
[9]   CHOLECYSTOKININ-GATED CURRENTS IN NEURONS OF THE RAT SOLITARY COMPLEX IN-VITRO [J].
BRANCHEREAU, P ;
CHAMPAGNAT, J ;
DENAVITSAUBIE, M .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1993, 70 (06) :2584-2595
[10]   CCK MODULATES INHIBITORY SYNAPTIC TRANSMISSION IN THE SOLITARY COMPLEX THROUGH CCKB SITES [J].
BRANCHEREAU, P ;
CHAMPAGNAT, J ;
ROQUES, BP ;
DENAVITSAUBIE, M .
NEUROREPORT, 1992, 3 (10) :909-912