REGISTRATION OF COLORECTAL-CANCER IN SCOTLAND - AN ASSESSMENT OF DATA ACCURACY BASED ON REVIEW OF MEDICAL RECORDS

被引:13
作者
BREWSTER, D
MUIR, C
CRICHTON, J
机构
[1] Scottish Cancer Intelligence Unit, Information and Statistics Division, Edinburgh, EH5 3SQ, Trinity Pk. House, South Trinity Rd.
关键词
COLORECTAL CANCER; CLASSIFICATION; ICD/SNOMED CODES; ACCURACY; SCOTLAND;
D O I
10.1016/S0033-3506(95)80206-1
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Colorectal cancer accounts for a substantial burden of morbidity and mortality in the population. While the need for reliable incidence data may be self-evident, the quality of cancer registration data has rarely been assessed. In Scotland during 1993, the medical records of a random sample of cancer registrations attributed to the year 1990 were sought. The sample contained 238 registrations of colorectal cancer, 217 (91%) of which had relevant medical records available for review. Registration details were reabstracted from available records and compared with data in the registry. Discrepancies in identifying items of data (surname, forename, sex and date of birth) were recorded in eight cases (3.7%, 95% confidence intervals 1.2-6.2%). None would have disturbed record linkage. Discrepancy rates of 3.7% (1.2-6.3%) in postcode of residence at the time of diagnosis (excluding differences arising through boundary changes), 8.3% (4.6-12.0%) in 'anniversary date' (excluding differences of 30 days or less), 2.8% (0.6-5.0%) in histological verification status and 13.5% (8.9-18.1%) in morphology code (excluding 'inferred' morphology codes) were recorded. Twelve cases (5.5%, 2.5-8.6%) were deemed not to warrant site codes for cancer of the colon (ICD-9 153) or rectum (ICD-9 154). In many respects, therefore, the data held about registrations of colorectal cancer in Scotland appear to show a high level of accuracy. Completeness of case ascertainment has still to be formally assessed.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 292
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
BLACK RJ, 1993, TRENDS CANCER SURVIV
[2]   HOW ACCURATE ARE SCOTTISH CANCER REGISTRATION DATA [J].
BREWSTER, D ;
CRICHTON, J ;
MUIR, C .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1994, 70 (05) :954-959
[3]  
BREWSTER D, 1994, ACCURACY 1990 CANCER
[4]   CANCER REGISTRATION BY LINKING PATHOLOGY AND DISTRICT PAS DATA [J].
CODLING, BW ;
PHEBY, D ;
HAGEN, DL ;
DUFFIN, MF .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1990, 62 (02) :271-274
[5]  
*COLL AM PATH, 1977, SYST NOM MED
[6]  
DELATTRE O, 1989, LANCET, V2, P353
[7]   EPIDEMIOLOGICAL EVIDENCE FOR DISTINGUISHING SUBSITES OF COLORECTAL-CANCER [J].
FAIVRE, J ;
BEDENNE, L ;
BOUTRON, MC ;
MILAN, C ;
COLLONGES, R ;
ARVEUX, P .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 1989, 43 (04) :356-361
[8]   THE RELIABILITY OF CANCER REGISTRY RECORDS [J].
GULLIFORD, MC ;
BELL, J ;
BOURNE, HM ;
PETRUCKEVITCH, A .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1993, 67 (04) :819-821
[9]   CHANGING SITE DISTRIBUTION OF COLORECTAL-CANCER [J].
KEE, F ;
WILSON, RH ;
GILLILAND, R ;
SLOAN, JM ;
ROWLANDS, BJ ;
MOOREHEAD, RJ .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1992, 305 (6846) :158-158
[10]   CONFIDENCE-INTERVALS AND INTERVAL CANCERS - NEEDLES AND HAYSTACKS [J].
KEE, F ;
GORMAN, D ;
ODLINGSMEE, W .
PUBLIC HEALTH, 1992, 106 (01) :29-35