THE USE OF DERMATOMAL EVOKED-RESPONSES DURING SURGICAL-PROCEDURES THAT USE INTRAPEDICULAR FIXATION OF THE LUMBOSACRAL SPINE

被引:47
作者
TOLEIKIS, JR
CARLVIN, AO
SHAPIRO, DE
SCHAFER, MF
机构
[1] Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, IL
关键词
INTRAPEDICULAR FIXATION; SOMATOSENSORY EVOKED POTENTIALS; FALSE-NEGATIVE; DERMATOMAL EVOKED POTENTIALS;
D O I
10.1097/00007632-199312000-00006
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Monitoring of electrophysiologic function during intrapedicular fixation of the lumbosacral spine can be useful because this fixation technique has been associated with a significant number of postoperative radicular complications. Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) traditionally have been used to monitor neurologic function during spinal instrumentation procedures. A case is presented of an intrapedicular fixation procedure that was monitored with SEPs and that resulted in false negative SEP findings. This result suggests that SEPs may not be a sensitive enough monitoring tool for detecting compromise of single root function, and as a result, other monitoring techniques should be used. Dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials (DSEPs) have been reported to be useful in this regard. To test their usefulness, 81 lumbosacral intrapedicular fixation procedures were monitored with DSEPs. Repeatable responses were obtained from all but one of the patients. The responses were sensitive to the compromise of root function. Predictions of postoperative outcome were dependent only on the responses at closing and not on changes that occurred during surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:2401 / 2407
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]
Aminoff M.J., Goodin D.S., Parry G.J., Barbaro N.M., Weinstein P.R., Rosenblum M.L., Electrophysiologic evaluation of lumbosacral radiculopathies: Electromyography, late responses, and somatosensory evoked potentials, Neurology, 35, pp. 1514-1518, (1985)
[2]
Ben-David B., Haller G., Taylor P., Anterior spinal fusion complicated by paraplegia: A case report of a false-negative somatosensory-evoked potential, Spine, 12, pp. 536-539, (1987)
[3]
Brown R.H., Nash C.L., Berilla J.A., Amaddio M.D., Cortical evoked potential monitoring: A system for intraoperative monitoring of spinal cord function, Spine, 9, pp. 256-261, (1984)
[4]
Chatrian G.E., Berger M.S., Wirch A.L., Discrepancy between intraoperative SSEP’s and postoperative function, J Neurosurg, 69, pp. 450-454, (1988)
[5]
Cohen B.A., Huizenga B.A., Dermatomal monitoring for surgical correction of spondylolisthesis, Spine, 13, pp. 1125-1128, (1988)
[6]
Cohen B.A., Major M.R., Huizenga B.A., Predictability of adequacy of spinal root decompression using evoked potentials, Spine, 16, pp. 379-384, (1991)
[7]
Eisen A., Hoirch M., Moll A., Evaluation of radiculopathies by segmental stimulation and somatosensory evoked potentials, Can J Neurol Sci, 10, pp. 178-182, (1983)
[8]
Engler G.L., Spielholz N.I., Bernhard W.N., Danziger F., Merkin H., Wolff T., Somatosensory evoked potentials during Harrington instrumentation for scoliosis, J Bone Joint Surg, 60A, pp. 528-532, (1978)
[9]
Esses S.I., Botsford D.J., Wright T., Bednar D., Bailey S., Operative treatment of spinal fractures with the AO internal fixator, Spine, 16, pp. 146-150, (1991)
[10]
Grundy B.L., Evoked potential monitoring, Monitoring in Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine. Edited by CD Blitt, pp. 345-411, (1985)