CORRELATION OF ABDOMINAL ULTRASOUND AND COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY SCANS WITH 2ND-LOOK OR 3RD-LOOK LAPAROTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH OVARIAN-CARCINOMA

被引:38
作者
LUND, B
JACOBSEN, K
RASCH, L
JENSEN, F
OLESEN, K
FELDTRASMUSSEN, K
机构
[1] RIGSHOSP,FINSEN INST,DEPT DIAGNOST RADIOL,DK-2100 COPENHAGEN,DENMARK
[2] RIGSHOSP,FINSEN INST,DEPT CLIN PHYSIOL,DK-2100 COPENHAGEN,DENMARK
[3] RIGSHOSP,FINSEN INST,DEPT NUCL MED,DK-2100 COPENHAGEN,DENMARK
[4] UNIV COPENHAGEN HOSP,BISPEBJERG HOSP,DEPT INTERNAL MED C,DK-2100 COPENHAGEN,DENMARK
[5] UNIV COPENHAGEN HOSP,BISPEBJERG HOSP,DEPT DIAG RADIOL,DK-2100 COPENHAGEN,DENMARK
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0090-8258(90)90348-O
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
To determine the best noninvasive means of evaluating response in patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma, 50 abdominal ultrasound (US) and computed tomography (CT) scans were performed in clinically disease-free ovarian cancer patients. The scans were correlated with the results obtained at a subsequent second- or third-look laparotomy. CT and US were not complementary, and only metastases larger than 2 cm were detected. The overall positive predictive value of nonconcordant scans was 57% compared with 100% for concordant CT and US (95% confidence limits: 18.4-90.1 and 29.2-100%, respectively). The corresponding negative predictive values were 45 and 47% (30.2-59.9 and 30.4-61.2%, respectively), if undetected microscopic disease was classified as a false-negative result. The negative predictive value of US and CT increased only to 60% in both cases, if undetected microscopic disease was registered as a true-negative result. Compared with the pelvic examination CT and US added positive information for 4 of 22 (18%) patients with macroscopic residual disease. In this study neither CT nor US was sensitive enough to preclude second-look laparotomy. © 1990.
引用
收藏
页码:279 / 283
页数:5
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
ARMITAGE P, 1980, STATISTICAL METHODS
[2]  
BAST RC, 1987, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V60, P1984, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19901015)60:8+<1984::AID-CNCR2820601510>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-W
[4]  
Beahrs OH, 1988, MANUAL STAGING CANCE, P163
[5]  
BEREK JS, 1983, OBSTET GYNECOL, V61, P189
[6]  
BRENNER DE, 1985, OBSTET GYNECOL, V65, P715
[7]   PITFALLS IN INTERPRETATION OF COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY PRIOR TO 2ND-LOOK LAPAROTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH OVARIAN-CANCER [J].
CALKINS, AR ;
STEHMAN, FB ;
WASS, JL ;
SMIRZ, LR ;
ELLIS, JH .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1987, 60 (718) :975-979
[8]   COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY IN EVALUATION OF PATIENTS WITH OVARIAN-CARCINOMA IN COMPLETE CLINICAL REMISSION - CORRELATION WITH SURGICAL-PATHOLOGICAL FINDINGS [J].
CLARKEPEARSON, DL ;
BANDY, LC ;
DUDZINSKI, M ;
HEASTON, D ;
CREASMAN, WT .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1986, 255 (05) :627-630
[9]   ANOTHER LOOK AT THE 2ND-ASSESSMENT PROCEDURE FOR OVARIAN EPITHELIAL CARCINOMA [J].
GALLUP, DG ;
TALLEDO, OE ;
DUDZINSKI, MR ;
BROWN, KW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1987, 157 (03) :590-596
[10]   SELECTION AND INTERPRETATION OF DIAGNOSTIC-TESTS AND PROCEDURES - PRINCIPLES AND APPLICATIONS [J].
GRINER, PF ;
MAYEWSKI, RJ ;
MUSHLIN, AI ;
GREENLAND, P .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1981, 94 (04) :553-+