SPINAL-CORD INJURIES IN ICELAND 1973-1989 - A FOLLOW-UP-STUDY

被引:38
作者
KNUTSDOTTIR, S
机构
[1] Superintendent Physiotherapist, Department of Rehabilitation and Neurology, Borgarspitalinn, Reykjavik
来源
PARAPLEGIA | 1993年 / 31卷 / 01期
关键词
SPINAL CORD INJURY; ICELAND; FOLLOW UP STUDY; COMPLICATIONS; SOCIAL FUNCTIONS;
D O I
10.1038/sc.1993.10
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
All traumatic SCI patients in Iceland come to the Neurosurgical Department of Borgarspitalinn, the City Hospital in Reykjavik for their initial treatment. From 1973-1989, 79 (93%) were rehabilitated at Borgarspitalinn. The purpose of this study was to look at the most common complications and the social functions of SCI patients after discharge from the Rehabilitation Department. A questionnaire was sent to 59 of the 79 patients. They represent almost the whole population of the spinal cord injured population in Iceland. Forty-five patients (76.3%) answered the questionnaire, 69% male, 31% female. Sixty-seven percent were under the age of 30 years at the time of injury. Twenty-nine percent had a complete spinal cord injury; 53.3% were wheelchairbound (Frankel grade A, B, C); 55.6% were quadriplegic, and 44.4% paraplegic. The commonest complications were pain (64.4%), urinary tract infections (62.2%) and spasticity (60%); and 58% of the wheelchairbound patients had had pressure sores. Fifty-five point five percent were married; 71% had an active sexual life after the injury; 54% of the wheelchairbound patients were not quite independent and required some assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) tasks; and 29% were not working or studying compared to 11%, who were, before the injury. No significant changes were seen in social function after the injury. The results show that more emphasis must be placed on the prevention of complications such as urinary tract infections and pressure sores and on the treatment of chronic pain and spasticity.
引用
收藏
页码:68 / 72
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Knutsdottir, Spinal cord injuriesin Iceland 1973-1982. An epidemiological study, FélagsmiOill Félags Islenskra sjukrapjâlfara, 2, pp. 35-39, (1984)
[2]  
Knutsdottir, Spinal cord injuresin Iceland 1973-1989, Bladid, Blad lôjupjâlfafélags Islands, 1, pp. 20-26, (1990)
[3]  
Kurtzke J.F., Epidemiology of spinal cord injury, Exper Neural, 48, pp. 163-236, (1975)
[4]  
Yarkony G.M., Roth E.J., Heinemann A.W., Wu Y., Kazt R.T., Lowell L., Benefits of rehabilitation for traumatic spinal cord injury. Multivariate analysis of 711 patients, Arch Neural, 44, pp. 93-96, (1987)
[5]  
Yarkony G.M., Orth E.J., Meyer, Lowell P.R., Heinemann L., Betts A., Spinal cord injury care system: Fifteen-year experience at the Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Paraplegia, 28, pp. 321-329, (1990)
[6]  
Biering-Sorensen, Pedersen F.V., Clausen S., Epidemiology of spinal cord lesions in Denmark, Paraplegia, 28, pp. 105-118, (1990)
[7]  
Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury Patients, (1982)
[8]  
Drewes A.M., Reasen A., Olsson A.T., Slot A., Sygdomsforlöbethos patienter indlagt i en rehabiliteringsafdeling efter rygmarvslæsion, Ugeskrift Lreger, Videnskab Og Praksis, 151, 48, pp. 3233-3236, (1989)
[9]  
Eisenberg, Tierney M., Changing demographic profile of the spinal cord injury population: Implication for health care support systems, Paraplegia, 23, pp. 335-343, (1985)
[10]  
Bridle M.J., Lynch K.B., Quesenberg C.M., Long term function following the central cord syndrome, Paralegia, 28, pp. 178-185, (1990)