JUROR SENSITIVITY TO EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION EVIDENCE

被引:204
作者
CUTLER, BL [1 ]
PENROD, SD [1 ]
DEXTER, HR [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV WISCONSIN,MADISON,WI 53706
关键词
D O I
10.1007/BF01062972
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
A mock-jury study was conducted to examine juror sensitivity to eyewitness identification evidence. Subjects were 129 eligible and experienced jurors from Dane County, Wisconsin, who viewed a videotaped trial that involved an eyewitness identification. Ten factors associated with the crime and the identification (e.g., disguise of the perpetrator, retention interval, confidence of the witness) were manipulated. The results of this mock-jury study were combined with those of a previous study using the same experimental stimuli and procedures, but using undergraduates as subjects. This analysis showed that the confidence of the eyewitness was the most powerful predictor of verdicts (p<.05) and that differences between undergraduates and eligible jurors in their sensitivity to eyewitness evidence were negligible. © 1990 Plenum Publishing Corporation.
引用
收藏
页码:185 / 191
页数:7
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   CORRELATION OF EYEWITNESS ACCURACY AND CONFIDENCE - OPTIMALITY HYPOTHESIS REVISITED [J].
BOTHWELL, RK ;
BRIGHAM, JC ;
DEFFENBACHER, KA .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1987, 72 (04) :691-695
[2]   JUROR DECISION-MAKING IN EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATION CASES [J].
CUTLER, BL ;
PENROD, SD ;
STUVE, TE .
LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 1988, 12 (01) :41-55
[3]   THE EYEWITNESS, THE EXPERT PSYCHOLOGIST, AND THE JURY [J].
CUTLER, BL ;
PENROD, SD ;
DEXTER, HR .
LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 1989, 13 (03) :311-332
[4]  
CUTLER BL, 1987, LAW HUMAN BEHAV, V11, P223
[5]  
Ebbesen E. B., 1979, LAW HUMAN BEHAV, V3, P39, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF01039148
[6]   THE IMPACT OF GENERAL VERSUS SPECIFIC EXPERT TESTIMONY AND EYEWITNESS CONFIDENCE UPON MOCK JUROR JUDGMENT [J].
FOX, SG ;
WALTERS, HA .
LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 1986, 10 (03) :215-228
[7]   CAN PEOPLE DETECT EYEWITNESS-IDENTIFICATION ACCURACY WITHIN AND ACROSS SITUATIONS [J].
LINDSAY, RCL ;
WELLS, GL ;
RUMPEL, CM .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1981, 66 (01) :79-89
[8]   MOCK-JUROR EVALUATIONS OF EYEWITNESS TESTIMONY - A TEST OF METAMEMORY HYPOTHESES [J].
LINDSAY, RCL ;
LIM, R ;
MARANDO, L ;
CULLY, D .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 16 (05) :447-459
[9]  
Malpass RS., 1983, EVALUATING WITNESS E, P81