RESPONSES OF PORCINE GASTRIC AND DUODENAL SMOOTH-MUSCLE TO VIP

1 Mechanical activity was recorded in isolated muscle preparations from circular and longitudinal layers of gastric fundus, corpus and antrum and from the duodenum of pigs, using conventional organ bath technique. Rectangular current pulses were applied to the muscle strips for electrical field stimulation (EFS). 2 Fundic and circular corpus preparations developed a marked spontaneous tonic activity. Vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP, 10(-9)-10(-7) mol l-1) inhibited this spontaneous activity. This inhibitory effect was not affected by application of tetrodotoxin (TTX) showing its myogenic nature. 3 Pretreatment of fundic and circular corpus preparations with VIP reduced the excitatory responses to substance P, bombesin, serotonin and histamine, but it had no effect on the acetylcholine (ACh)-induced tonic and phasic activity. 4 Longitudinal duodenal preparations showed purely phasic activity which was almost insensitive to VIP. In circular duodenal preparations particularly strong spontaneous tonic contractions were observed which could be inhibited by VIP. 5 Circular duodenal preparations excised 3-5 cm postpyloric had a spontaneous tone which could reach up to 80% of the maximum contractions induced by 10(-4) mol l-1 ACh. These preparations were chosen for further pharmacological studies and for experiments with EFS. VIP was the most powerful substance for the inhibition of spontaneous tone, followed by serotonin, PGE2 and bradykinin. This type of preparation exhibited particularly strong inhibitory effects to EFS; even single stimuli could induce near maximum relaxation. The inhibition induced by EFS was unaffected by treatment with ATP, guanethidine, atropine, methysergide and apamin. TTX completely abolished the EFS-induced relaxation, showing its neurogenic nature. 6 Porcine circular duodenum is a good model for studying the transmitter system of the non-adrenergic, non-cholinergic (NANC) innervation. The results are consistent with the assumption that VIP is the transmitter in this system, although the very slow time-course of the VIP-induced inhibition in comparison with the EFS-induced inhibition is not consistent with this notion.