EVALUATION OF AN AGAR-GEL IMMUNODIFFUSION TEST TO DETECT INFECTION OF CATTLE WITH BLUETONGUE VIRUSES IN QUEENSLAND, AUSTRALIA

被引:9
作者
WARD, MP
GARDNER, IA
FLANAGAN, M
机构
[1] UNIV CALIF DAVIS, SCH VET MED, DEPT MED & EPIDEMIOL, DAVIS, CA 95616 USA
[2] QUEENSLAND DEPT PRIMARY IND, TOWNSVILLE, QLD 4810, AUSTRALIA
关键词
BLUETONGUE VIRUS; SEROLOGY; CATTLE; AUSTRALIA;
D O I
10.1016/0378-1135(94)00119-H
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
An agar gel immunodiffusion (AGID) test to detect group-specific antibodies to infection of cattle by bluetongue viruses was evaluated using field collected sera in Queensland, Australia. The AGID test was compared to the serum neutralisation (SN) test used to detect serotype-specific bluetongue virus antibodies, The AGID test was found to be highly sensitive (95% confidence interval, 80.7-100%) but to have moderate specificity (95% confidence interval, 59.3-79.6%), relative to the SN test. The correlation between AGID and SN test results was 0.41 (P < 0.001) Using likelihood ratio estimates the chance (posttest probability) of an AGID test positive serum sample being positive (titre greater than or equal to 1:20) in the SN test was estimated to be 87% and 90% for 2 + and 3 + AGID test reactions, respectively. A serum sample was estimated to have a probability of 40% of being positive in the SN test if it gave a 1 + reaction in the AGID test. Results suggest that the AGID test should ideally be used as a screening test in serological surveys and surveillance programs. If the test is to be used for identification of individually infected cattle, a cutoff point of greater than or equal to 2 + should be employed.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 34
页数:8
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Daniel, Applied Nonparametric Statistics, pp. 358-363, (1978)
  • [2] Della-Porta, Sellers, Herniman, Littlejohns, Cybinski, St George, McPhee, Snowdon, Campbell, Cargill, Corbould, Chung, Smith, Serological studies of Australian and Papua New Guinean cattle and Australian sheep for the presence of antibodies against bluetongue group viruses, Vet. Microbiol., 8, pp. 147-162, (1983)
  • [3] Della-Porta, Parsonson, McPhee, Problems in the interpretation of diagnostic tests due to cross-reactions between orbiviruses and broad serological responses in animals, Bluetongue and Related Orbiviruses, pp. 445-453, (1985)
  • [4] Fleiss, Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, pp. 14-15, (1981)
  • [5] Fletcher, Fletcher, Wagner, Clinical epidemiology: the essentials, pp. 61-64, (1988)
  • [6] Gard, Shorthose, Weir, Walsh, Melville, Arboviruses recovered from sentinel cattle using several virus isolation methods, Vet. Microbiol., 18, pp. 109-118, (1988)
  • [7] Hanley, Lippman-Hand, If nothing goes wrong, is everything all right? Interpreting zero numerators, J. Am. Med. Assoc., 249, pp. 1743-1745, (1983)
  • [8] Jochim, An overview of diagnostics for bluetongue, Bluetongue and Related Orbiviruses, pp. 423-433, (1985)
  • [9] Jochim, Chow, Immunodiffusion of bluetongue virus, Am. J. Vet. Res., 30, pp. 33-41, (1969)
  • [10] Littlejohns, Burton, The occurrence of antibody to bluetongue virus in New South Wales. II. Coastal region and age distribution surveys, Aust. J. Biol. Sci., 41, pp. 571-578, (1988)