PRECISION OF SKIN PRICK AND PUNCTURE TESTS WITH 9 METHODS

被引:81
作者
DEMOLY, P
BOUSQUET, J
MANDERSCHEID, JC
DREBORG, S
DHIVERT, H
MICHEL, FB
机构
[1] HOP AIGUELONGUE, MALAD RESP CLIN, F-34059 MONTPELLIER, FRANCE
[2] LINKOPING UNIV HOSP, DEPT INFORMAT MED, S-58185 LINKOPING, SWEDEN
[3] LINKOPING UNIV HOSP, DEPT PEDIAT, S-58185 LINKOPING, SWEDEN
关键词
HISTAMINE; SKIN TEST; PRICK TEST; REPRODUCIBILITY; HUMAN;
D O I
10.1016/0091-6749(91)90183-O
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
New devices for puncture tests have been proposed recently, but their precision by comparison to the prick test method is poorly known. Seven puncture tests (Allerprick, Morrow Brown standardized needle, Phazer, Pricker, Stallerpointe, Stallerkit, and Wyeth bifucated needle) were compared with the modified prick test performed with hypodermic or intradermal needles in eight carefully selected normal volunteers. Skin tests with histamine hydrochloride (10 mg/ml) were only performed when there was no factor that might interfere with their interpretation. The site of skin tests on the forearm was demonstrated not to significantly influence the reaction size. The coefficient of variation of the tests ranged from 8.4% to 21.7%. Modified skin prick tests are satisfactory since they are highly reproducible (coefficient of variation: 13.4% and 16.5%) and there is no subject effect. Phazet was found to be more reproducible without subject effect. Pricker is satisfactory since it has no subject effect and a reproducibility similar to that of modified prick tests. Other tests are less reproducible (Stallerkit or Morrow Brown) or vary between subjects (Allerkit, Stallerkit, Stallerpointe, and Wyeth Needle).
引用
收藏
页码:758 / 762
页数:5
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] A COMPARISON OF 6 EPICUTANEOUS DEVICES IN THE PERFORMANCE OF IMMEDIATE HYPERSENSITIVITY SKIN TESTING
    ADINOFF, AD
    ROSLONIEC, DM
    MCCALL, LL
    NELSON, HS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1989, 84 (02) : 168 - 174
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1989, ALLERGY S10, V10, P1
  • [3] STANDARDIZATION OF THE PRICK TEST - A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF 3 METHODS
    BASOMBA, A
    SASTRE, A
    PELAEZ, A
    ROMAR, A
    CAMPOS, A
    GARCIAVILLALMANZO, A
    [J]. ALLERGY, 1985, 40 (06) : 395 - 399
  • [4] BELIN L, 1985, ALLERGY S4, V40, P60
  • [5] BELIN L, 1986, 4TH P INT P EHRL SEM, P145
  • [6] COMPARISON OF THE STABILITY OF A MITE AND A POLLEN EXTRACT STORED IN NORMAL CONDITIONS OF USE
    BOUSQUET, J
    DJOUKADAR, F
    HEWITT, B
    GUERIN, B
    MICHEL, FB
    [J]. CLINICAL ALLERGY, 1985, 15 (01): : 29 - 35
  • [7] BOUSQUET J, 1988, ALLERGY PRINCIPLES P, P414
  • [8] PRICK TESTING FOR ALLERGENS STANDARDIZED BY USING A PRECISION NEEDLE
    BROWN, HM
    SU, S
    THANTREY, N
    [J]. CLINICAL ALLERGY, 1981, 11 (01): : 95 - 98
  • [9] COMPARISON BETWEEN MODIFIED SKIN PRICK TEST WITH STANDARDIZED ALLERGEN EXTRACTS AND PHAZET
    CHANAL, I
    HORST, M
    SEGALEN, C
    DREBORG, S
    MICHEL, FB
    BOUSQUET, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1988, 82 (05) : 878 - 881
  • [10] LEARNING TO COIN AGENT AND INSTRUMENT NOUNS
    CLARK, EV
    HECHT, BF
    [J]. COGNITION, 1982, 12 (01) : 1 - 24