THE ASSESSMENT OF IADL MOTOR-SKILLS - AN APPLICATION OF MANY-FACETED RASCH ANALYSIS

被引:158
作者
FISHER, AG
机构
[1] Occupational Therapy Department, College of Applied Human Sciences, Colorado State University
关键词
ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING EVALUATION;
D O I
10.5014/ajot.47.4.319
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Traditional methods of developing tests have been driven by item content specification and have relied on the use of summed ordinal scores in an attempt to create a quantitative index of ability. There are fundamental problems with this approach to test development. Tbe first problem is that the summing of qualitative ordinal counts to create a total score does not result in a number that is a valid means of making quantitative comparisons of performances. Tbe second problem is that reliance on content experts does not ensure that the test items indeed test the construct in question. As a result, the development of functional assessments based on Rasch measurement models is becoming a preferred method among rehabilitation professionals for constructing tests. Rasch measurement models offer an alternative approach to instrument development that results in unidimensional linear measures based on additive numbers. Rasch analyses also generate goodness-of-fit statistics that can be used to perform confirmatory construct validity analyses of the constructed scales based on (a) formulating expectations about what should happen when a group of persons take a test, and then (b) confirming that the test items fit that model. This paper describes bow the many-faceted Rasch model was used to develop the motor scale of the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS) (Fisher, 1992). Tbe process of beginning test development with a theory of expectations related to a constructed scale and then confirming that the scale conforms to these expectations also is demonstrated.
引用
收藏
页码:319 / 329
页数:11
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
ANDRICH D, 1988, 07068 SAG U PAP SER
[2]  
Doble S., 1988, CANADIAN J OCCUPATIO, V55, P75, DOI 10.1177/000841748805500206
[3]  
FISHER A, 1992, UNPUB ASSESSMENT MOT
[4]  
FISHER AG, IN PRESS INT J ED RE
[5]  
FISHER AG, IN PRESS OBJECTIVE M, V2
[6]   MEASUREMENT-RELATED PROBLEMS IN FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT [J].
FISHER, WP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 1993, 47 (04) :331-338
[7]  
FISHER WP, IN PRESS OBJECTIVE M, V2
[8]   OARS METHODOLOGY - A DECADE OF EXPERIENCE IN GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT [J].
GEORGE, LK ;
FILLENBAUM, GG .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 1985, 33 (09) :607-615
[9]  
Hambleton R, 1989, ED MEASUREMENT, P147
[10]  
Heinemann AW, 1991, RATING SCALE ANAL FU