CONTRAST-ENHANCED MR-IMAGING OF DIFFUSE AND FOCAL SPLENIC DISEASE WITH USE OF MAGNETIC STARCH MICROSPHERES

被引:11
作者
KREFT, BP
TANIMOTO, A
LEFFLER, S
FINN, JP
OKSENDAL, AN
STARK, DD
机构
[1] KEIO UNIV HOSP,DEPT RADIOL,TOKYO,JAPAN
[2] UNIV MASSACHUSETTS,MED CTR,DEPT RADIOL,WORCESTER,MA 01605
[3] HARVARD UNIV,NEW ENGLAND DEACONESS HOSP,SCH MED,DEPT RADIOL,BOSTON,MA 02215
[4] NYCOMED IMAGING AS,DIV R&D,OSLO,NORWAY
来源
JMRI-JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING | 1994年 / 4卷 / 03期
关键词
CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTRAST MEDIA; EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES; IRON; RELAXOMETRY; SPLEEN; NEOPLASMS;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.1880040324
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The diagnostic value of magnetic starch microspheres (MSM), a new superparamagnetic contrast agent, was studied in experimental models of diffuse and focal splenic disease in rats by means of ex vivo relaxometry and in vivo magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Owing to small differences in unenhanced T1 and T2 values between diffuse lymphoma and normal spleen, MR imaging failed to distinguish tumor-bearing animals from control animals by signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) obtained with T1- and T2-weighted spin-echo sequences. One hour after injection of 20 mumol/kg MSM, lymphomatous spleen showed significantly (P < .001) reduced enhancement relative to normal splenic tissue. As a result, animals with diffuse lymphoma (SNR: 10.3 +/- 1.7) could be easily differentiated from control animals (SNR: 5.5 +/- 0.6) on T2-weighted (TR msec/TE msec = 2,000/45) images. In focal splenic disease, MSM produced normal enhancement of nontumorous splenic tissue, whereas relaxation times of tumors were not different before and after contrast agent injection. On T2-weighted images (2,000/45), the tumor-spleen contrast-to-noise ratio increased from 4.8 +/- 1.6 to 21.8 +/- 1.9 (+354%). improving conspicuity of splenic tumors. The results show that MSM-enhanced MR imaging improves the detection of diffuse and focal splenic disease.
引用
收藏
页码:373 / 379
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
BOTTOMLEY PA, 1984, MED PHYS, V11, P425, DOI 10.1118/1.595535
[2]  
CASTELLINO RA, 1982, CANCER TREAT REP, V66, P697
[3]   MAGNETIC-RESONANCE IMAGING OF LYMPHOMAS IN CHILDREN [J].
COHEN, MD ;
KLATTE, EC ;
SMITH, JA ;
MARTINSIMMERMAN, P ;
CARR, B ;
BAEHNER, R ;
WEETMAN, R ;
PROVISOR, A ;
COATES, T ;
BERKOW, R ;
WEISMAN, SJ ;
MCKENNA, S ;
MCGUIRE, W .
PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 1985, 15 (03) :179-183
[4]  
DAVEY FR, 1973, AM J CLIN PATHOL, V59, P95
[5]  
DORNFEST BS, 1975, J RETICULOENDOTH SOC, V17, P274
[6]   MAGNETIC STARCH MICROSPHERES - INTERACTIONS OF A MICROSPHERE MR CONTRAST-MEDIUM WITH MACROPHAGES INVITRO [J].
FAHLVIK, AK ;
ARTURSSON, P ;
EDMAN, P .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS, 1990, 65 (03) :249-259
[7]   MAGNETIC STARCH MICROSPHERES, BIODISTRIBUTION AND BIOTRANSFORMATION - A NEW ORGAN-SPECIFIC CONTRAST AGENT FOR MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING [J].
FAHLVIK, AK ;
HOLTZ, E ;
SCHRODER, U ;
KLAVENESS, J .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1990, 25 (07) :793-797
[8]   RELAXATION EFFICACY OF PARAMAGNETIC AND SUPERPARAMAGNETIC MICROSPHERES IN LIVER AND SPLEEN [J].
FAHLVIK, AK ;
HOLTZ, E ;
KLAVENESS, J .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1990, 8 (04) :363-369
[9]  
GOFFINET DR, 1973, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V32, P672, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(197309)32:3<672::AID-CNCR2820320321>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-Q