Road to Ruin? A Spatial Analysis of State Highway Spending

被引:19
作者
Bruce, Donald [1 ,2 ]
Carroll, Deborah [3 ]
Deskins, John [4 ]
Rork, Jonathan [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, CBER, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
[2] Univ Tennessee, Dept Econ, Knoxville, TN USA
[3] Univ Georgia, Sch Publ & Int Affairs, Dept Publ Adm, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[4] Creighton Univ, Econ & Finance Dept, Omaha, NE 68178 USA
[5] Georgia State Univ, Andrew Young Sch Policy Studies, Dept Econ, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1540-5850.2007.00888.x
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
Do states engage in infrastructure expenditure competition to attract new economic activity? Economic theory is inconclusive on the matter. States might respond to increased infrastructure spending in competitor states by increasing their own infrastructure spending. Conversely, states may decrease spending in the presence of positive spillovers from competitor states' infrastructure investment. Using spatial econometric techniques and focusing specifically on highway spending, we demonstrate that states expend less on highways when spending in neighboring states increases. We explore this possibility further by modeling state personal income growth as a function of own-state and neighborstate highway spending. Our findings suggest positive spillovers influence interstate relationships for highway spending rather than race-to-the-top competition for economic activity.
引用
收藏
页码:66 / 85
页数:20
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   The spillover effects of state spending [J].
Baicker, K .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2005, 89 (2-3) :529-544
[2]  
BESLEY T, 1995, AM ECON REV, V85, P25
[3]  
Bland RobertL., 1992, PUBLIC BUDGETING FIN, V12, P32
[4]  
Brittain Len S., 2002, CAN TAX J, V50, P552
[5]   Do local governments engage in strategic property-tax competition? [J].
Brueckner, JK ;
Saavedra, LA .
NATIONAL TAX JOURNAL, 2001, 54 (02) :203-229
[6]   Testing for strategic interaction among local governments: The case of growth controls [J].
Brueckner, JK .
JOURNAL OF URBAN ECONOMICS, 1998, 44 (03) :438-467
[7]   Local business taxation and competition for capital: the choice of the tax rate [J].
Buettner, T .
REGIONAL SCIENCE AND URBAN ECONOMICS, 2001, 31 (2-3) :215-245
[8]   MUNICIPAL CAPITAL-MAINTENANCE AND FISCAL DISTRESS [J].
BUMGARNER, M ;
MARTINEZVAZQUEZ, J ;
SJOQUIST, DL .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1991, 73 (01) :33-39
[9]   INTERSTATE TAX COMPETITION AFTER TRA86 [J].
CASE, A .
JOURNAL OF POLICY ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT, 1993, 12 (01) :136-148
[10]   BUDGET SPILLOVERS AND FISCAL-POLICY INTERDEPENDENCE - EVIDENCE FROM THE STATES [J].
CASE, AC ;
ROSEN, HS ;
HINES, JR .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 1993, 52 (03) :285-307