PAROXYSMAL BUNDLE-BRANCH BLOCK OF SUPRAVENTRICULAR ORIGIN - A POSSIBLE SOURCE OF MISDIAGNOSIS IN DETECTING VENTRICULAR-TACHYCARDIA USING TIME DOMAIN ANALYSES OF INTRAVENTRICULAR ELECTROGRAMS

Current implantable antitachycardia devices use several methods for differentiating sinus rhythm (SR)from Supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) or ventricular tachycardia (VT). These methods include sustained high rate, the rate of onset, changes in cycle length, and sudden onset. Additional methods for detecting VT include techniques based upon ventricular electrogram morphology. The morphological approach is based on the assumption that the direction of cardiac activation, as sensed by a bipolar electrode in the ventricle, is different when the patient is in SR as compared to VT. Whether paroxysmal bundle branch block of Supraventricular origin (BBB) can be differentiated from VT has not been determined. In this study, we compared the morphology of the ventricular electrogram during sinus rhythm with a normal QRS (SRNIQRS) or SVT with a normal QRS (SVTNIQRS) with the morphologies of BBB and VT in 30 patients undergoing cardiac electrophysiology studies. Changes in ventricular electrogram morphology were determined using three previously proposed time domain methods for VT detection: Correlation Waveform Analysis (CWA), Area of Difference (AD), and Amplitude Distribution Analysis (ADAJ. CWA, AD, and ADA distinguished VT from SRNIQRS or SVTNIQRS in 16/17 (94%), 14/57 (82%), and 12/17 (71%) patients, and BBB from SRNIQRS or SVTNIQRS in 15/15 (100%), 13/15 (87%), and 6/15 (40%) patients, respectively. However, the ranges of values during BBB using these methods overlapped with ranges of values during VT in all cases for CWA, AD, and ADA. Hence, BBB may be a source of misdiagnosis in detecting VT when these time domain methods are used for ventricular electrogram analysis. Copyright © 1990, Wiley Blackwell. All rights reserved