LOGICAL PRINCIPLES IN DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS

[1] BAKER SF, 1957, INDUCTION HYPOTHESIS, P153

[2] BARKER SF, 1957, INDUCTION HYPOTHESIS, P162

[3] BARKER SF, 1957, INDUCTION HYPOTHESIS, P109

[4] BRAITHWAITE RB, 1955, SCIENTIFIC EXPLANATI, P303

[5] CABOT RC, 1911, DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOS, V2, P18

[6] Cabot Richard C., 1911, DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOS, P19

[7] FEINSTEIN AR, 1967, CLINICAL JUDGMENT, P164

[8] FRYE AM, 1941, RATIONAL BELIEF, P297

[9] GOLDBERGER E, 1965, HOW PHYSICIANS THINK, P14

[10] REGULARIZATION AND STYLIZATION OF MEDICAL RECORDS [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1970, 212 (09): : 1502 - &

[1] BAKER SF, 1957, INDUCTION HYPOTHESIS, P153

[2] BARKER SF, 1957, INDUCTION HYPOTHESIS, P162

[3] BARKER SF, 1957, INDUCTION HYPOTHESIS, P109

[4] BRAITHWAITE RB, 1955, SCIENTIFIC EXPLANATI, P303

[5] CABOT RC, 1911, DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOS, V2, P18

[6] Cabot Richard C., 1911, DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOS, P19

[7] FEINSTEIN AR, 1967, CLINICAL JUDGMENT, P164

[8] FRYE AM, 1941, RATIONAL BELIEF, P297

[9] GOLDBERGER E, 1965, HOW PHYSICIANS THINK, P14

[10] REGULARIZATION AND STYLIZATION OF MEDICAL RECORDS [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1970, 212 (09): : 1502 - &