COMPARISON OF 10-O POLYPROPYLENE AND 10-O NYLON SUTURES IN RAT ARTERIAL ANASTOMOSIS

被引:10
作者
CHEN, LE [1 ]
SEABER, AV [1 ]
URBANIAK, JR [1 ]
机构
[1] DUKE UNIV, MED CTR, DEPT SURG, ORTHOPAED RES LABS, POB 3093, DURHAM, NC 27710 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1002/micr.1920140508
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The selection of suture materials is an important factor in further improving the results of microsurgical operations. In this study, two kinds of nonabsorbable suture materials, 10-0 polypropylene and 10-0 nylon monofilament, were compared in end-to-end anastomosis of 66 femoral arteries of adult rats. Both suture types were of identical size (70 mum needle/28 mum suture) and each artery received eight sutures. The vessels were harvested at various intervals from 2 hr to 180 days postoperatively and were evaluated by pathology, radiology, and tensile strength test. The results show that both sutures are capable of achieving excellent long-term patency (100%) of anastomosed sites. Polypropylene suture was equivalent to nylon in mechanical integrity of the anastomosis sites but was superior in handling, knotting, and biocompatibility. These physical and biological properties of polypropylene sutures may offer the benefits of diminished early and late complications at anastomosis sites and reduced operation time. Enhancement of contrast against surrounding tissue may make polypropylene a superior alternative to nylon sutures for microsurgical use.
引用
收藏
页码:328 / 333
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Salthouse TN, Biologic response to sutures, Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 88, pp. 658-664, (1980)
[2]  
Usher FC, Allen JE, Crosthwait RW, Cogan JE, Polypropylene monofilament. A new, biologically inert suture for closing contaminated wounds, JAMA, 179, pp. 780-782, (1962)
[3]  
Beckman H, Bending of excessively long intraocular suture material by argon laser, Am J Ophthal, 91, (1981)
[4]  
Dayman HM, Polypropylene, Ophthalmology, 88, pp. 959-964, (1981)
[5]  
Brandt B, Groeger EC, Lamberth WC, Anastomotic false aneurysms. A comparison of braided dacron and polypropylene sutures, Am Surg, 48, pp. 255-257, (1982)
[6]  
Orringer MB, Appleman HD, Argenta L, Bove E, Cimmino V, Polypropylene suture in esophageal and gastrointestinal operations, Surg Gynecol Obstet, 144, pp. 67-70, (1977)
[7]  
Kratzer GL, Intestinal anastomosis and abdominal wound closure using monofilament prolene polypropylene suture: report of fifty cases, Dis Colon Rectum, 21, pp. 342-345, (1978)
[8]  
Van Winkle W, Hastings JC, Consideration in the choice of suture material for various tissues, Surg Gynecol Obstet, 135, pp. 113-126, (1972)
[9]  
Postlethwait RW, Long‐term comparative study of nonabsorbable sutures, Ann Surg, 171, pp. 892-898, (1970)
[10]  
Bartone FF, Stinson W, Reaction of the urinary tract to polypropylene sutures, Inves Urol, 14, pp. 44-46, (1976)