COMPARISON OF DIRECT VS FUMIGATION INCUBATION MICROBIAL BIOMASS ESTIMATES FROM ECTOMYCORRHIZAL MAT AND NON-MAT SOILS

Direct estimates of microbial biomass were compared to chloroform fumigation incubation estimates of microbial biomass using samples collected from mesic forest stands. Paired soil samples were collected from ectomycorrhizal mats, which contain visible amounts of fungal material, and from non-mat areas immediately adjacent to the mats but which contain no visible fungal material. As much as 30-50% of the dry wt of soil collected from ectomycorrhizal mats can be comprised of strictly fungal biomass. Direct estimates of microbial biomass from both mat and non-mat soils were 10-300 times higher than biomass estimates obtained using the fumigation incubation method. Fumigation incubation estimates of microbial biomass showed little seasonal variation, while direct estimates revealed that microbial biomass peaked during both the spring and fall when rainfall and temperatures were optimal and were lowest during the dry summer. We compared our values to ones reported for shortgrass prairies and in Jenkinson's original fumigation incubation paper. Fumigation incubation estimates indicated that microbial biomass carbon was the same in both prairie and forest soils, about 0.5 mg C g-1 soil. Direct estimates showed that microbial biomass was actually greater, by factors of 10-300, in these forest soils. Some forest soils, for which fumigation incubation indicated very low microbial biomass, contained visible amounts of fungal hyphae. Our conclusion is that fumigation incubation does not necessarily measure microbial biomass, and that the error can be extremely high when soils contain high quantities of fungal biomass.