LONG-TERM EVALUATION OF TREATMENT FOR CHRONIC HEART-FAILURE - A 1 YEAR COMPARATIVE TRIAL OF FLOSEQUINAN AND CAPTOPRIL

Two hundred and nine patients with moderate to severe chronic heart failure, all of whom remained symptomatic despite at least 80 mg of frusemide daily, were randomized to 12 months treatment with flosequinan or captopril. The patients were stratified into two groups, a treadmill group and a corridor walk test group, depending upon their exercise capability. Sixty-five out of 102 patients randomized to flosequinan and 43 out of 107 randomized to captopril (p < 0.001) did not complete the study. There was no difference between the groups in mortality: 19 patients died while taking flosequinan and 15 while taking captopril. Both drugs had similar effects on treadmill exercise tolerance; the mean increase at week 52 was 117 seconds in the flosequinan group and 156 seconds (p = 0.57) for the captopril group. For those patients stratified to the corridor walk test only, there was also very little difference in the improvement at 52 weeks; the mean increase for patients randomized to flosequinan was 61 meters and captopril was 75 meters (p = 0.65). However, when the walk tests from all patients are examined, captopril produced a significant improvement compared with flosequinan at week 52 (p = 0.015). Flosequinan has similar longterm efficacy to captopril but is associated with a higher incidence of adverse events.