CONTRIBUTION OF SPECIALISTS TO THE DELIVERY OF PRIMARY CARE - NEW PERSPECTIVE

被引:230
作者
AIKEN, LH
LEWIS, CE
CRAIG, J
MENDENHALL, RC
BLENDON, RJ
ROGERS, DE
机构
[1] UNIV SO CALIF,SCH MED,DIV RES MED EDUC,LOS ANGELES,CA 90007
[2] UNIV CALIF LOS ANGELES,SCH MED,LOS ANGELES,CA 90024
[3] GEORGETOWN UNIV,SCH MED,HLTH POLICY RES GRP,WASHINGTON,DC 20007
关键词
D O I
10.1056/NEJM197906143002404
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100201 [内科学];
摘要
Despite increased numbers of medical-school graduates and opportunities for “primary-care” specialty training since the mid-1960's, many believe that the shortage of physicians delivering generalist care will continue through the 1980's. Missing, however, is solid information on the role of physician specialists in providing such care. Two national studies have shown that one of every five Americans now receives continuing general medical care from a specialist physician. Our study suggests that, despite the current shortage of generalistphysician services, continuing specialist participation in primary care will lead to sufficient generalist medical services by the mid-1980's. Whether specialist participation is the most appropriate or cost-effective way to improve access to such care is unclear. However, until this question is resolved, more governmental regulation of graduate medical education may be unwise. Offering all physicians, regardless of specialty, more primary-care experience during residency training might better deal with this aspect of American medical practice. (N Engl J Med 300:1363–1370, 1979) AFTER the publication of the report of the Citizens Commission on Graduate Medical Education (the Millis Report) over a decade ago, considerable attention was focused on the numbers of generalist physicians emerging from the nation's residency training programs.1 In the ensuing years a consensus gradually emerged that the country was underproducing generalists, or, in the terms of the commission's report, “primary physicians,” who would “serve as the primary medical resource and counselor to an individual or family.” In subsequent years, the commission's concept of the “primary physician” was modified, expanded and eventually equated with what is now called the “primary-care. © 1979, Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1363 / 1370
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]
GIRARD RA, ANN INTERN MED
[2]
MCDERMOTT W, 1974, JOHNS HOPKINS MED J, V135, P292
[3]
MCINERNY TK, 1978, PEDIATRICS, V61, P389, DOI 10.1542/peds.61.3.389
[4]
NATIONAL STUDY OF MEDICAL AND SURGICAL SPECIALTIES .2. DESCRIPTION OF SURVEY INSTRUMENT [J].
MENDENHALL, RC ;
LLOYD, JS ;
REPICKY, PA ;
MONSON, JR ;
GIRARD, RA ;
ABRAHAMSON, S .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1978, 240 (11) :1160-1168
[5]
NATIONAL STUDY OF MEDICAL AND SURGICAL SPECIALTIES .1. BACKGROUND, PURPOSE, AND METHODOLOGY [J].
MENDENHALL, RC ;
GIRARD, RA ;
ABRAHAMSON, S .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1978, 240 (09) :848-852
[6]
PERRIN EB, 1978, EVALUATION RELIABILI
[7]
DOCTORS DILEMMA [J].
PETERSDORF, RG .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1978, 299 (12) :628-634
[8]
WHO WILL TRAIN ALL THOSE PRIMARY-CARE PHYSICIANS [J].
RELMAN, AS .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1978, 299 (12) :652-654
[9]
ROSENBERG CL, 1975, MED ECON, V52, P131
[10]
MANPOWER POLICY FOR PRIMARY HEALTH-CARE [J].
SCHEFFLER, RM ;
WEISFELD, N ;
RUBY, G ;
ESTES, EH .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1978, 298 (19) :1058-1062