THE PROLIFERATIVE EFFECT OF ANTI-ANDROGENS ON THE ANDROGEN-SENSITIVE HUMAN PROSTATE TUMOR-CELL LINE LNCAP

The effect of steroidal and nonsteroidal “anti-androgens” on the proliferative capacity of androgen-sensitive LNCaP-FGC human prostate tumor cells in culture was studied using charcoal-dextran stripped human serum-supplemented media. Cyproterone and medroxyprogesterone acetates, flutam-ide, hydroxyflutamide, and anandron (R23908) were administered alone at concentrations between 3xl0-12and 3X10-6M. Results indicated that although medroxyprogesterone induced maximal proliferation at 3X10-9M, the other “anti-androgens” (with the exception of flutamide that was ineffective) were effective at 3xl0-8M and higher concentrations; the amplitude of the proliferative response by these compounds was comparable to that elicited by estradiol-17β (3 to 5-fold over control). None of the anti-androgens tested triggered the shutoff effect characteristic of androgen action. When 3xl0-10M DHT and the above mentioned anti-androgens were administered simultaneously, a synergistic pattern was seen; on the contrary, 3X10-8M DHT cancelled the proliferative effect of each of the_ anti-androgens when administered simultaneously. The relative binding affinity of these anti-androgens to androgen receptors present in LNCaP-FGC cells did not correlate well with their proliferative efficiency. The data collected were interpreted within the premises of the negative control hypotheses for the regulation of cell proliferation in metazoans. Within those prem-ises, results became compatible with the notion that first, “anti-androgens” elicited the proliferation of androgen-sensitive cells by neutralizing the effect of a serum-borne inhibitor (androcol-yone-I); this event seems not to be mediated by androgens receptors. Second, anti-androgens did not trigger a proliferative shutoff response like androgens do, i.e. the proliferative pattern induced by anti-androgens was comparable to that elicited by estrogens and progestins. Third, when administered simultaneously with 3X10-10M DHT, anti-androgens behaved synergisti-cally. Fourth, the DHT-induced shutoff effect consistently overrode the proliferative effect generated by anti-androgens and estrogens when added alone. Finally, taken together these results raise important questions regarding the therapeutic role of anti-androgens in prostate cancer. © 1990 by The Endocrine Society.