TONGUE-FLICKING AND BITING IN RESPONSE TO CHEMICAL FOOD STIMULI BY AN IGUANID LIZARD (DIPSOSAURUS-DORSALIS) HAVING SEALED VOMERONASAL DUCTS - VOMEROLFACTION MAY MEDIATE THESE BEHAVIORAL-RESPONSES

被引:65
作者
COOPER, WE [1 ]
ALBERTS, AC [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV CALIF SAN DIEGO,DEPT BIOL,LA JOLLA,CA 92993
关键词
VOMERONASAL SYSTEM; VOMEROLFACTION; FEEDING; FOOD VOMODOR; REPTILIA; LACERTILIA; IGUANIDAE; DIPSOSAURUS-DORSALIS;
D O I
10.1007/BF00994427
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
In the iguanid lizard Dipsosaurus dorsalis, chemical food stimuli were discriminated from other odorants by vomerolfaction. This was demonstrated in a 2 x 3 experiment in which groups of lizards with sealed vomeronasal ducts or sham-sealed vomeronasal ducts responded to carrot chemical stimuli, cologne, and distilled water presented on cotton-tipped applicators. Abilities to detect and discriminate food chemicals were abolished in lizards having sealed vomeronasal ducts. For tongue-flick attack score and number of lizards biting, the sham-sealed group responded more strongly to carrot stimuli than to the control stimuli, but the group having sealed ducts did not. Lizards having sham-sealed ducts responded more strongly to carrot stimuli than did lizards having sealed ducts; responses by the two groups of lizards to control stimuli did not differ. Tongue-flicking occurred when the vomeronasal system detected a chemical stimulus from either carrot or cologne. Biting occurred only when the vomeronasal organ detected food stimuli (from carrot). Most duct-sealed lizards opened their mouths, some repeatedly. Mouth-opening thus occurs when the vomeronasal organ does not detect chemicals. It may be an attempt to stimulate or prime the vomeronasal organ or to dislodge the sealant.
引用
收藏
页码:135 / 146
页数:12
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   ULTRAVIOLET VISUAL SENSITIVITY IN DESERT IGUANAS - IMPLICATIONS FOR PHEROMONE DETECTION [J].
ALBERTS, AC .
ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 1989, 38 :129-137
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1956, NONPARAMETRIC STAT B
[3]  
BURGHARDT G. M., 1970, ADV CHEMORECEPTION, P241
[4]  
Burghardt G.M., 1980, CHEM SIGNALS, P275
[5]   CHEMICAL-CUE PREFERENCES OF INEXPERIENCED SNAKES - COMPARATIVE ASPECTS [J].
BURGHARDT, GM .
SCIENCE, 1967, 157 (3789) :718-+
[6]   ROLE OF TONGUE AND SENSES IN FEEDING OF NAIVE AND EXPERIENCED GARTER SNAKES [J].
BURGHARDT, GM ;
PRUITT, CH .
PHYSIOLOGY & BEHAVIOR, 1975, 14 (02) :185-194
[7]   FACTORS INFLUENCING CHEMICAL RELEASE OF PREY ATTACK IN NEWBORN SNAKES [J].
BURGHARDT, GM ;
HESS, EH .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1968, 66 (02) :289-+
[8]  
Carr J., 1982, Bulletin of the Maryland Herpetological Society, V18, P196
[9]  
Chiszar D., 1980, CHEM SIGNALS, P125
[10]   ABSENCE OF PREY ODOR DISCRIMINATION BY IGUANID AND AGAMID LIZARDS IN APPLICATOR TESTS [J].
COOPER, WE .
COPEIA, 1989, (02) :472-478