CHILDHOOD-CANCER AFTER PRENATAL EXPOSURE TO DIAGNOSTIC-X-RAY EXAMINATIONS IN BRITAIN

被引:112
作者
MOLE, RH
机构
[1] Heath Barrows, Bayworth Lane, Oxford
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1038/bjc.1990.249
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Detailed data were provided by the Oxford Survey of Childhood Cancer OSCC on deaths from childhood cancer in Britain after irradiation of the fetus during diagnostic radiology of the mother. In each age group at death, 0-5, 6-9 and 10-15 years, excess cancer deaths decreased suddenly for births in and after 1958. A major factor was concerted action initiated in 1956 to reduce radiation exposure of fetal gonads for fear of genetic hazards. Dose reduction was achieved during 1957 and early 1958 by reducing the rising rate of obstetric radiography and by virtually abandoning pelvimetry as that had been understood. In the 1970s the rate of X-raying increased again and so did cancer risk but not significantly. Direct evidence that diagnostic X-rays can cause childhood cancer is the similar excess rate per X-ray in twins and singleton births when X-raying rate is 5-6 times higher in twins. In the past a dose-response for cancer in OSCC data based on number of films per X-ray examination was taken to be evidence for causation but dose per film varies with kind of X-ray examination. Fixed values for dose per film were mistakenly assumed by UNSCEAR (1972) and used by it and others when deriving risk co-efficients. In updated OSCC data cancer risk is independent of film number. The odds ratio for childhood cancer deaths after X-raying in birth years 1958-61 (1. 23 with 95% confidence intervals Cl 1. 04-1. 48) and the mean fetal whole body dose from obstetric radiography in 1958 (0. 6 cGy) can each be derived from nationwide surveys in Britain. The corresponding risk coefficient for irradiation in the third trimester for childhood cancer deaths at ages 0-15 years = 4-5xl0-4 per cGy fetal whole body dose (95% Cl 0. 8-9. 5 x 104 per cGy). It is the same for cancer incidence and mortality. A lower risk in bomb survivors exposed in utero is not incompatible since its Cl are wide. There is no dependable evidence that radiosensitivity is greater in early pregnancy. A significantly raised cancer rate after diagnostic X-raying supports the hypothesis that carcinogenesis by ionising radiation has no threshold. © The MacMillan Press Ltd., 1990.
引用
收藏
页码:152 / 168
页数:17
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1988, SOURCES EFFECTS RISK
[2]   MATERNAL AND FOETAL RADIATION DOSAGE DURING OBSTETRIC RADIOGRAPHIC EXAMINATIONS [J].
BEWLEY, DK ;
LAWS, JW ;
MYDDLETON, CJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1957, 30 (354) :286-290
[3]   PRENATAL IRRADIATION AND CHILDHOOD MALIGNANCY - REVIEW OF BRITISH DATA FROM OXFORD SURVEY [J].
BITHELL, JF ;
STEWART, AM .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1975, 31 (03) :271-287
[4]   A NEW CALCULATION OF THE CARCINOGENIC RISK OF OBSTETRIC X-RAYING [J].
BITHELL, JF ;
STILLER, CA .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1988, 7 (08) :857-864
[5]  
BROWNE FJ, 1951, ANTENATAL POSTNATAL, P44
[6]  
Butler NR, 1963, PERINATAL MORTALITY
[7]  
CARMICHAEL JHE, 1976, LANCET, V1, P351
[8]  
CHAMBERLAIN G, 1978, BRIT BIRTHS 1970, V2, P24
[9]  
Clark KC, 1956, POSITIONING RADIOGRA
[10]  
Clark KC, 1964, POSITIONING RADIOGRA