FAIRNESS IN SIMPLE BARGAINING EXPERIMENTS

被引:1164
作者
FORSYTHE, R
HOROWITZ, JL
SAVIN, NE
SEFTON, M
机构
[1] Department of Economics, University of Iowa, Iowa City
关键词
D O I
10.1006/game.1994.1021
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We present an experiment to test whether fairness alone can explain proposers' willingness to make nontrivial offers in simple bargaining games. We examine two treatments: game (ultimatum or dictator) and pay (pay or no pay). The outcomes of the ultimatum and dictator games with pay are significantly different, implying that fairness, by itself, cannot explain the observed behavior. Doubling the amount of money available in games with pay does not affect these results. The outcomes of both games are replicable when players are paid, but the outcome of the ultimatum game is not replicable when players are not paid. Journal of Economic Literature Classification Numbers: 026, 215. (C) 1994 Academic Press, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:347 / 369
页数:23
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] BINMORE K, 1985, AM ECON REV, V75, P1178
  • [2] BINMORE K, 1984, FAIRNESS GAMESMANSHI
  • [3] BOLTON GE, 1991, AM ECON REV, V81, P1096
  • [4] Epps T. W., 1986, J STAT COMPUT SIMUL, V26, P177, DOI DOI 10.1080/00949658608810963
  • [5] AN EXPERIMENTAL-ANALYSIS OF ULTIMATUM BARGAINING
    GUTH, W
    SCHMITTBERGER, R
    SCHWARZE, B
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 1982, 3 (04) : 367 - 388
  • [6] Kim P.J., 1974, SELECTED TABLES MATH, VI, P79
  • [7] NEELIN J, 1988, AM ECON REV, V78, P824
  • [8] OCHS J, 1989, AM ECON REV, V79, P355
  • [9] Owen D.B., 1973, SELECTED TABLES MATH, P171
  • [10] ROTH AE, 1991, AM ECON REV, V81, P1068