DIALYSIS STAFF INFLUENCE PATIENTS IN FORMULATING THEIR ADVANCE DIRECTIVES

Patients on chronic dialysis were surveyed to determine the degree to which completion of advance directives (ADs) was influenced by personal factors that patients bring to their dialysis situation (eg, demographic characteristics or personal preferences) and by environmental factors that are not under their control (eg, interaction with dialysis staff or hospital system). Of the 113 questionnaires distributed to the population of 40 hemodialysis and 73 peritoneal dialysis patients, 90 (80%) were completed. Although only 17% of the respondents had actually completed written ADs previously, respondents seemed to have a good general understanding of ADs, as evidenced by the 80% overall accuracy on a 19-question portion of the survey that tested knowledge regarding ADs. While a few personal factors, such as gender, dialysis modality, perceived quality of life, and attitude toward death, were associated with completion of ADs, most other demographic variables, including age, marital status, religion, work status, number of years of education, disability status, locus of control, renal diagnosis, and number of years on dialysis, were not correlated. More prominently correlated with completion of ADs were environmental factors, such as having dialysis staff discuss ADs with patients, patients being asked to complete ADs at the time of hospitalization, and perception of staff as being comfortable discussing ADs with patients. The overall results of the survey suggest that discussing ADs as an ongoing activity may have been positively influenced by the Federal Patient Self-Determination Act of 1991. In addition, patient distress in discussing death may be reduced over time with a process that includes ongoing discussions, increased knowledge about ADs, and greater trust in family and dialysis staff. Thus, the approach taken by dialysis and hospital staff may be at least as important as the personal characteristics of the patients in promoting this important process. (C) 1995 by the National Kidney Foundation, Inc.