Antihypertensive effects of amlodipine and hydrochlorothiazide in elderly patients with ambulatory hypertension

被引:25
作者
Lacourciere, Y
Poirier, L
Lefebvre, J
Archambault, F
Cleroux, J
Boileau, G
机构
[1] Hypertension Research Unit, Le Centre Hospitalier, l'Université Laval, Sainte-Foy, Que.
[2] Pfizer Canada, Montreal, Que.
关键词
amlodipine; hydrochlorothiazide; elderly ambulatory hypertensives;
D O I
10.1016/0895-7061(95)00362-2
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Recent studies and authorities have advocated the use of low-dose thiazide diuretics as first-line treatment agents in elderly hypertensives. However, these recommendations were based solely on blood pressure (BP) measured in the clinic. The objective of the present 32-week double-blind study was to compare the effects of hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) and amlodipine (AML) in elderly patients with confirmed ambulatory hypertension. After a 4-week placebo washout period, 42 (25 men, 17 women) patients (mean age, 69 years) with clinic sitting diastolic BP of 95 to 114 mm Hg and daytime ambulatory diastolic BP of greater than or equal to 90 mm Hg were randomized double-blind to receive AML 5 to 10 mg (n = 21) or HCTZ 12.5 to 25 mg (n = 21) once daily. After 8 weeks of monotherapy, patients in whom clinic diastolic BP remained greater than or equal to 90 mm Hg were given combination therapy with the other agent. Amlodipine monotherapy induced significant reductions in clinic, mean 24-h, daytime and sleep systolic/diastolic BPs whereas only clinic BP decreased significantly in patients treated with HCTZ monotherapy. Moreover, 19/21 versus 8/21 patients on AML and HCTZ monotherapies achieved adequate BP control. At the end of the 32-week treatment period, combination therapy in the HCTZ group resulted in statistically significant reductions in clinic as well as in 24-h, daytime and sleep ambulatory BPs that were similar to those observed in the AML monotherapy group. In conclusion, the administration of AML monotherapy induced significant reductions in both clinic and ambulatory BPs in elderly patients whereas only clinic BP was significantly decreased by HCTZ monotherapy. Moreover, the addition of AML to HCTZ in patients inadequately controlled by monotherapy has permitted statistically significant decrements in clinic as well as in ambulatory BP. Consequently, the results of the present study suggest that the use of HCTZ in doses of up to 25 mg daily is inadequate for ambulatory BP control in the elderly despite official recommendations.
引用
收藏
页码:1154 / 1159
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure, The fifth report of the Joint National Committee on Detection Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC V), Archives of Internal Medicine, 153, pp. 154-183, (1993)
[2]  
Prevention of stroke by antihypertensive drug treatment in older persons with isolated systolic hypertension Final results of the Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP), JAMA, 265, pp. 3255-3264, (1991)
[3]  
Dahlof, Lindhalm, Hansson, Et al., Morbidity and mortality in the Swedish Trial in Old Patients with Hypertension (STOP-Hypertension), Lancet, 338, pp. 1281-1285, (1991)
[4]  
Medical Research Council Trial of Treatment of Hypertension in older adults principal results, BMJ, 304, pp. 405-412, (1992)
[5]  
Reeves, Fodor, Gryfe, Et al., Report of the Canadian Hypertension Society CONSENSUS conference: hypertension in the elderly, Can Med Assoc J, 149, pp. 815-820, (1993)
[6]  
Heber, Brigden, Al-Khowaja, Raftery, 24-h blood pressure control with the once daily calcium antagonist, amlodipine, Br J Clin Pharmacol, 27, pp. 359-365, (1989)
[7]  
Lacourciere, Poirier, Provencher, Comparison of amlodipine and captopril in hypertension based on 24-hour ambulatory monitoring, Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, 22, pp. S20-S23, (1993)
[8]  
Millar-Craig, Bishop, Raftery, Circadian variation of blood pressure, Lancet, 1, pp. 795-799, (1978)
[9]  
Pickering, Blood pressure measurement and detection of hypertension, Lancet, 344, pp. 31-35, (1994)
[10]  
Graettinger, Lipson, Cheung, Weber, Validation of portable noninvasive blood pressure monitoring devices comparison with intra-arterial and sphygmomanometer measurements, American Heart Journal, 116, pp. 1155-1160, (1988)