CENTRAL AND PERIPHERAL FATIGUE OF HUMAN DIAPHRAGM AND LIMB MUSCLES ASSESSED BY TWITCH INTERPOLATION

1. This study used a sensitive modification of the twitch interpolation technique to compare the extent of voluntary neural drive to the diaphragm and the elbow flexors during fatigue. For the diaphragm both inspiratory and expulsive efforts were tested. and fatigue was induced by expulsive efforts which were either maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs, 10 s duration, 50 % duty-cycle) or submaximal contractions (50 % MVC, 3 s duration, 60 % duty cycle). 2. Over the series of thirty MVCs peak elbow torque declined to 57.9 +/- 3.0 % (mean +/- S.E.M.) of the initial value while maximal inspiratory pressure declined to 78.7 +/- 7.3 % (P < 0.05). For the diaphragm the relative decline in voluntary peak inspiratory (and expulsive) force was similar to the decline in twitch responses to single and twin (10 ms interval) stimuli. However. for the elbow flexors the decline in twitch force was disproportionately greater than the decline in maximal voluntary force. The decline in twitch force for the diaphragm could not be attributed to failure at the neuromuscular junction. 3. At the start of the exercise, twitch potentiation (following three brief MVCs) was significantly less for the diaphragm than for the elbow flexors (20 % versus 61 %. P < 0.01). 4. In the unfatigued state maximal voluntary efforts by subjects activated 98-4 +/- 0.4% of the stimulated elbow flexors compared with 95.0 +/- 1.5% of the diaphragm (P < 0.05). During the exercise period there was a progressive failure in the ability to activate the limb muscle ('Central fatigue': voluntary drive declined from 98.4 +/- 0.4 to 86.8 +/- 2.2 %, P < 0.01) whereas the decline in voluntary aetivation during inspiratory contractions was not significant (from 95.0 +/- 15 to 91.5 +/- 2-5 %). 5. Voluntary activation during attempted maximal efforts was less complete for both muscles when stimuli were delivered without warning. The index of voluntary activation for unwarned stimuli was lower for the diaphragm (performing expulsive efforts, 81.0 +/- 2.8 %) than for the limb muscle (89.9 + 1.5 %, P < 0.01). 6. During repeated submaximal expulsive efforts we confirmed that subjects develop a marked inability to contract the diaphragm voluntarily, but when the diaphragm performed inspiratory manoeuvres at the same level of contractile fatigue, the index of voluntary drive was greater than 94 %. 7. In conclusion, when tested with inspiratory efforts the diaphragm developed less central fatigue than the limb muscle over the same exercise period. However, substantial central fatigue of the diaphragm does develop during prolonged series of expulsive contractions which markedly elevated abdominal pressure.