ROOT-GROWTH OF MAIZE CULTIVARS UNDER FIELD CONDITIONS AS STUDIED BY THE CORE AND MINIRHIZOTRON METHOD AND RELATIONSHIPS TO SHOOT GROWTH

被引:42
作者
WIESLER, F
HORST, WJ
机构
[1] Institute of Plant Nutrition, University of Hannover, Hannover, D-30419
来源
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PFLANZENERNAHRUNG UND BODENKUNDE | 1994年 / 157卷 / 05期
关键词
D O I
10.1002/jpln.19941570506
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
In a 2-year field study conducted on a Gleyic Luvisol in Stuttgart-Hohenheim, root growth of one experimental and nine commercial maize cultivars was studied. According to the core method, roots of all cultivars penetrated the soil down to a depth of 150 cm indicating that no differences in maximum rooting depth existed. However, significant differences among the cultivars were found in root-length densities (RLD) at silking in 1987 (1988) the ranges being 3.07 - 4.41 (2.88 - 4.43), 1.21 - 2.14 (1.14 - 1.75), 0.24 - 0.68 (0.24 - 0.56), and 0.05 - 0.12 (0.05 - 0.13) cm cm-3 in the various 30 cm layers down to 120 cm depth. In both years of the study vegetative yield was positively correlated with RLD in the 60 - 90 cm layer, whereas relationships between shoot traits and total root length were not consistent between the years. Differences between cultivars in root growth as identified by the core method could be confirmed by minirhizotron observations only at early stages of plant development. Quantitative comparisons between both methods showed that minirhizotron observations resulted in (a) an underestimation of root density (RD) in the topsoil and (b) the description of a linear decline of RD with depth below 30 cm whereas RLD in the soil cores decreased exponentially with depth. When RD at 7.5 and 15 cm profile depth were excluded from analysis, significant positive relationships between ln RLD in soil cores and RD assessed with the minirhizotrons were calculated for different stages of plant development. However, the slope of the regression lines varied considerably between calibration dates indicating that one calibration is not sufficient to estimate RLD from minirhizotron observations.
引用
收藏
页码:351 / 358
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
BOHM W, 1978, Z ACKER PFLANZENBAU, V147, P264
[2]   MINIRHIZOTRON WHEAT ROOT DATA - COMPARISONS TO SOIL CORE ROOT DATA [J].
BOX, JE ;
RAMSEUR, EL .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1993, 85 (05) :1058-1060
[3]  
BOX JE, 1987, AM SOC AGRONOMY SPEC, V50, P123
[4]   A COMPARISON OF METHODS, INCLUDING ANGLED AND VERTICAL MINIRHIZOTRONS, FOR STUDYING ROOT-GROWTH AND DISTRIBUTION IN A SPRING OAT CROP [J].
BRAGG, PL ;
GOVI, G ;
CANNELL, RQ .
PLANT AND SOIL, 1983, 73 (03) :435-440
[5]   ROOT DEVELOPMENT OF 2 COTTON CULTIVARS IN RELATION TO POTASSIUM UPTAKE AND PLANT-GROWTH IN A VERMICULITIC SOIL [J].
BROUDER, SM ;
CASSMAN, KG .
FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 1990, 23 (3-4) :187-203
[6]  
BROUWER R., 1963, Jaarboek. Instituut voor biologisch en scheikundig Onderzoek van Landbouwgewassen 1963, P31
[7]   ROOTING PATTERNS OF SEMI-DWARF AND TALL WINTER-WHEAT CULTIVARS UNDER DRYLAND FIELD CONDITIONS [J].
CHOLICK, FA ;
WELSH, JR ;
COLE, CV .
CROP SCIENCE, 1977, 17 (04) :637-639
[8]   A COMPARISON OF MINIRHIZOTRON, CORE AND MONOLITH METHODS FOR QUANTIFYING BARLEY (HORDEUM-VULGARE L) AND FABABEAN (VICIA-FABA L) ROOT DISTRIBUTION [J].
HEERAMAN, DA ;
JUMA, NG .
PLANT AND SOIL, 1993, 148 (01) :29-41
[9]   PHENOTYPE AND DROUGHT TOLERANCE IN WHEAT [J].
HURD, EA .
AGRICULTURAL METEOROLOGY, 1974, 14 (1-2) :39-55
[10]  
Jordan W. R., 1980, Adaptation of plants to water and high temperature stress., P383