INVESTIGATION OF A SCREENING BATTERY FOR IMMUNOTOXICITY OF PHARMACEUTICALS WITHIN A 28-DAY ORAL TOXICITY STUDY USING AZATHIOPRINE AND CYCLOSPORINE-A AS MODEL COMPOUNDS

被引:21
作者
DEWAAL, EJ [1 ]
TIMMERMAN, HH [1 ]
DORTANT, PM [1 ]
KRANJC, MAM [1 ]
VANLOVEREN, H [1 ]
机构
[1] NATL INST PUBL HLTH & ENVIRONM PROTECT, PATHOL LAB, 3720 BA BILTHOVEN, NETHERLANDS
关键词
D O I
10.1006/rtph.1995.1047
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律]; R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
0301 ; 10 ;
摘要
The authors have investigated a panel of parameters for immunotoxicity that may be incorporated in routine screening for toxicity of pharmaceuticals. This panel comprises serum immunoglobulin concentrations, cellularity of bone marrow, weights and histopathology of thymus, spleen, and lymph nodes, histopathology of Peyers' patches, and FACScan analysis of lymphocyte subpopulations in the spleen, in addition to parameters of toxicity to other systems. To study the value of these assays for pharmaceuticals, the authors used the immunosuppressants azathioprine (AZP) and cyclosporin A (CsA) as model compounds with known immunotoxic activity. In two separate experiments, rats were treated by daily gastric intubation with 0, 5, 12.5, and 25 mg AZP/kg body wt or 0, 1.25, 5, and 20 mg CsA/ kg body wt. In the AZP study, the histopathology of the thymus and the spleen were valuable parameters of immunotoxicity, since these organs showed microscopic alterations at relatively low dose levels. In the CsA experiment, both the histopathology of the thymus and the data provided by FACScan analysis were sensitive indicators of immunotoxicity detecting effects at the lowest dose level employed, The data indicate that the lymphoid system is the most sensitive target of toxicity after AZP or CsA administration. The authors conclude that their test battery yielded immunotoxicity profiles of AZP and CsA in rats that were consistent with published findings in the literature, indicating the usefulness of the test battery employed. (C) 1995 Academic Press, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:327 / 338
页数:12
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
BESCHORNER WE, 1987, AM J PATHOL, V126, P487
[2]   THE ROLE OF CONVENTIONAL PATHOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY IN EVALUATING THE IMMUNOTOXIC POTENTIAL OF XENOBIOTICS [J].
BLOOM, JC ;
THIEM, PA ;
MORGAN, DG .
TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY, 1987, 15 (03) :283-293
[3]   THE IMMUNOPHARMACOLOGY OF IMMUNOTOXICOLOGY, AND IMMUNORESTORATION [J].
CASPRITZ, G ;
HADDEN, J .
TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY, 1987, 15 (03) :320-332
[4]  
COHEN SM, 1983, CANCER RES, V43, P2768
[5]   IMMUNOTOXICOLOGY - AN OVERVIEW [J].
DEAN, JH ;
THURMOND, LM .
TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY, 1987, 15 (03) :265-271
[6]  
DEAN JH, 1982, PHARMACOL REV, V34, P137
[7]   SEQUENTIAL-ANALYSES OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF LYMPHOPROLIFERATIVE DISORDERS IN RATS RECEIVING CYCLOSPORINE [J].
DEMETRIS, AJ ;
NALESNIK, MA ;
KUNZ, HW ;
GILL, TJ ;
SHINOZUKA, H .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1984, 38 (03) :239-246
[8]  
Descotes J., 1986, IMMUNOTOXICOLOGY DRU
[9]   IMMUNOTOXICOLOGY - SUPPRESSIVE AND STIMULATORY EFFECTS OF DRUGS AND ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICALS ON THE IMMUNE-SYSTEM - A DISCUSSION [J].
GLEICHMANN, E ;
KIMBER, I ;
PURCHASE, IFH .
ARCHIVES OF TOXICOLOGY, 1989, 63 (04) :257-273
[10]   AZATHIOPRINE HEPATOTOXICITY, DIRECT COMPLICATION OR SECONDARY EFFECT IN RAT-LIVER TRANSPLANTATION [J].
HESS, F ;
JERUSALEM, C ;
POLAK, M .
EUROPEAN SURGICAL RESEARCH, 1976, 8 (02) :156-165