POLICY COMMUNITY REALISM VERSUS NEW INSTITUTIONALIST AMBIGUITY

被引:27
作者
JORDAN, G
机构
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-9248.1990.tb01082.x
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
There has been widespread interest in the term ‘institution’ within political science in the past five years. Two principal uses of this are identified. The first is associated with the policy community literature and in this sense the institution is an extra‐constitutional policymaking arrangement between ministries and clientelistic groups. The second use of the term is associated with state‐centred authors who wish to argue for the relative autonomy of political institutions. In this second use there is ambiguity about the scope of the term institution; whether it is, or is not, intended to be confined to traditional institutions or whether the disaggregated state embraces the newer policy community phenomenon. Copyright © 1990, Wiley Blackwell. All rights reserved
引用
收藏
页码:470 / 484
页数:15
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
ALMOND G, 1988, AM POLIT SCI REV, V82, P862
[2]  
ALT J, 1987, BRIT J POLIT SCI, V17, P154
[3]  
[Anonymous], LEGISLATIVE PROCESS
[4]  
ATKINSON M, 1989, BRIT J POLIT SCI, P19
[5]  
Baur R., 1964, AM BUSINESS PUBLIC P
[6]  
CAMMACK P, 1989, BRIT J POLITICAL SCI, V19
[7]  
CATER D, 1964, POWER WASHINGTON
[8]  
Coleman W. D., 1990, POLICY COMMUNITIES P
[9]  
DEARLOVE J, 1989, POLITICAL STUDIES, V37, P523
[10]  
Dyson Kenneth, 1980, STATE TRADITION W EU