FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES IN CLINICAL MEASURES OF SPEECH RECOGNITION AMONG THE ELDERLY

被引:137
作者
HUMES, LE [1 ]
WATSON, BU [1 ]
CHRISTENSEN, LA [1 ]
COKELY, CG [1 ]
HALLING, DC [1 ]
LEE, L [1 ]
机构
[1] INDIANA UNIV,DEPT SPEECH & HEARING SCI,AUDIOL RES LAB,BLOOMINGTON,IN 47405
来源
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH | 1994年 / 37卷 / 02期
关键词
SPEECH RECOGNITION; ELDERLY; AGING; PRESBYACUSIS; AUDITORY PROCESSING;
D O I
10.1044/jshr.3702.465
中图分类号
H [语言、文字];
学科分类号
05 ;
摘要
In the present study, the speech-recognition performance of 50 subjects aged 63 to 83 years was measured for a wide range of materials (nonsense syllables, monosyllabic words, sentences) and listening conditions (presentation levels of 70 and 90 dB SPL, both in quiet and in a noise background). In addition to complete audiologic evaluations, measures of auditory processing (the Test of Basic Auditory Capabilities [TBAC], Watson, 1987) and cognitive function (Wechsler Adult intelligence Scale-Revised [WAIS-R], and the Wechsler Memory Scale-Revised [WMS-R], Wechsler, 1981, 1987) were obtained from all subjects. Principal component analyses were applied to each of the three sets of measures (speech-recognition, auditory, and cognitive) prior to examining associations among the sets using canonical analyses. Two principal components captured most of the systematic variation in performance sampled by the set of 20 speech-recognition measures. Hearing loss emerged as the single largest factor associated with individual differences in speech-recognition performance among the elderly, accounting for 70-75% of the total variance in speech-recognition performance, with the measures of auditory processing and cognitive function accounting for little or no additional variance.
引用
收藏
页码:465 / 474
页数:10
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
*AM NAT STAND I, 1987, ANSIS311987
[2]  
*AM NAT STAND I, 1989, ANSIS361989
[3]   STANDARDIZATION OF A TEST OF SPEECH-PERCEPTION IN NOISE [J].
BILGER, RC ;
NUETZEL, JM ;
RABINOWITZ, WM ;
RZECZKOWSKI, C .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1984, 27 (01) :32-48
[4]   THE NATIONAL-ACOUSTIC-LABORATORIES (NAL) NEW PROCEDURE FOR SELECTING THE GAIN AND FREQUENCY-RESPONSE OF A HEARING-AID [J].
BYRNE, D ;
DILLON, H .
EAR AND HEARING, 1986, 7 (04) :257-265
[5]   SOME PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF THE TEST OF BASIC AUDITORY CAPABILITIES (TBAC) [J].
CHRISTOPHERSON, LA ;
HUMES, LE .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1992, 35 (04) :929-935
[6]   RELIABILITY OF 2 MEASURES OF SPEECH RECOGNITION IN ELDERLY PEOPLE [J].
COKELY, CG ;
HUMES, LE .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1992, 35 (03) :654-660
[7]  
ESPINOSAVARAS B, 1986, J ACOUST SOC AM S1, V80, pS12
[8]   DEVELOPMENT OF A DICHOTIC SENTENCE IDENTIFICATION TEST FOR HEARING-IMPAIRED ADULTS [J].
FIFER, RC ;
JERGER, JF ;
BERLIN, CI ;
TOBEY, EA ;
CAMPBELL, JC .
EAR AND HEARING, 1983, 4 (06) :300-305
[9]   HEARING-LOSS, AGING, AND SPEECH-PERCEPTION IN REVERBERATION AND NOISE [J].
HELFER, KS ;
WILBER, LA .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1990, 33 (01) :149-155
[10]   AGING AND THE BINAURAL ADVANTAGE IN REVERBERATION AND NOISE [J].
HELFER, KS .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1992, 35 (06) :1394-1401