HLA TYPE AS A PREDICTOR OF MIXED CONNECTIVE-TISSUE DISEASE DIFFERENTIATION - 10-YEAR CLINICAL AND IMMUNOGENETIC FOLLOW-UP OF 46 PATIENTS

被引:63
作者
GENDI, NST
WELSH, KI
VANVENROOIJ, WJ
VANCHEESWARAN, R
GILROY, J
BLACK, CM
机构
[1] CHURCHILL HOSP,OXFORD OX3 7LJ,ENGLAND
[2] UNIV NIJMEGEN,NIJMEGEN,NETHERLANDS
[3] ROYAL FREE HOSP,LONDON NW3 2QG,ENGLAND
来源
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM | 1995年 / 38卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1002/art.1780380216
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective. To determine any clinical or genetic markers of differentiation and outcome in a previously described cohort of 46 patients with mixed Connective tissue disease (MCTD), Methods. Patients were clinically evaluated, chart notes reviewed, and HLA subtyping and immunology profiles performed where possible, Eleven had died and 7 were lost to followup. Results. MCTD had differentiated into systemic lupus erythematosus in 12 patients and into systemic sclerosis in 13, The latter was associated with HLA-DR5 (P = 0.038), and nondifferentiation was associated with HLA-DR2 or DR4 (P = 0.007). Three HLA-DR4 positive patients had MCTD that evolved into rheumatoid arthritis, Erosive and/or deforming arthritis was associated with HLA-DR1 or DR4 (P = 0.015), HLA-DR3 was associated with interstitial lung fibrosis (P = 0.044) and keratoconjunctivitis sicca (0.001 < P < 0.01), Severe Raynaud's phenomenon predicted higher mortality (0.01 < P < 0.05). Conclusion. We suggest that MCTD is, for most patients, an intermediate stage in a genetically determined progression to a recognized connective tissue disease. Those whose disease remains undifferentiated might be considered a distinct subset.
引用
收藏
页码:259 / 266
页数:8
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
Gendi N, Gordon T, Tanner SB, Black CM, The evolution of a case of overlap syndrome with systemic sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus, Br J Rheumatol, 31, pp. 783-786, (1992)
[2]  
Sharp GC, Irvin WS, Tan EM, Gould RG, Holman HR, Mixed connective tissue disease: an apparently distinct rheumatic disease syndrome associated with a specific antibody to an extractable nuclear antigen (ENA), Am J Med, 52, pp. 148-159, (1972)
[3]  
Lazaro MA, Maldonado Cocco JA, Catoggio LJ, Babini SM, Messina OD, Gracia Morteo OG, Clinical and serologic characteristics of patients with overlap syndrome: is mixed connective tissue disease a distinct clinical entity, Medicine (Baltimore), 68, pp. 58-65, (1989)
[4]  
De Clerck LS, Meijers KAE, Cats A, Is MCTD a distinct entity? Comparison of clinical and laboratory findings in MCTD, SLE, PSJ and RA patients, Clin Rheumatol, 8, pp. 29-36, (1989)
[5]  
Black C, Isenberg DA, Mixed connective tissue disease: goodbye to all that, Br J Rheumatol, 31, pp. 695-700, (1992)
[6]  
Nimelstein SH, Brody S, McShane D, Holman HR, Mixed connective tissue disease: a subsequent evaluation of the original 25 patients, Medicine (Baltimore), 59, pp. 239-248, (1980)
[7]  
Bennett RM, O'Connell DJ, Mixed connective tissue disease: a clinicopathologic study of 20 cases, Semin Arthritis Rheum, 10, pp. 25-51, (1980)
[8]  
Watanabe Y, Tokunaga-K, Matsuki K, Takeuchi F, Matsuta K, Maeda H, Omoto K, Juji T, Putative amino acid sequence of HLA‐DRB chain contributing to rheumatoid arthritis susceptibility, J Exp Med, 169, pp. 2263-2268, (1989)
[9]  
Briggs D, Welsh KI, Major histocompatibility complex class II genes and systemic sclerosis, Ann Rheum Dis, 50, pp. 862-865, (1991)
[10]  
Briggs D, Stephens C, Vaughan R, Welsh K, Black C, A molecular and serologic analysis of the major histocompatibility complex and complement component C4 in systemic sclerosis, Arthritis Rheum, 36, pp. 943-954, (1993)