TIME FOR REVISIONISM ON RENT CONTROL

被引:152
作者
ARNOTT, R
机构
关键词
D O I
10.1257/jep.9.1.99
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Economists' traditional hostility to rent contols is based on models that treat the housing market as perfectly competitive and on the experience with 'hard' controls in New York City and many European countries following World War II. The current 'soft' rent control systems in North America are varied and qualitatively different from earlier hard controls. The theoretical case against them is weak, particularly when the housing market is viewed as imperfectly competitive. The empirical case against them is weak, too. Economists should reconsider their blanket opposition to current rent control systems and evaluate them on a case-by-case basis.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 120
页数:22
相关论文
共 62 条
  • [1] ALSTON RM, 1992, AM ECON REV, V82, P203
  • [2] A DYNAMIC, POLICY ORIENTED MODEL OF THE REGULATED HOUSING-MARKET - THE SWEDISH PROTOTYPE
    ANAS, A
    CHO, JR
    [J]. REGIONAL SCIENCE AND URBAN ECONOMICS, 1988, 18 (02) : 201 - 231
  • [3] HOUSING QUALITY, MAINTENANCE AND REHABILITATION
    ARNOTT, R
    DAVIDSON, R
    PINES, D
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1983, 50 (03) : 467 - 494
  • [4] ARNOTT R, 1979, UNPUB RENT CONTROLS
  • [5] ARNOTT R, 1987, HDB REGIONAL URBAN E, V2, P959, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1574-0080(87)80010-X
  • [6] ARNOTT R, 1981, RENT CONTROL OPTIONS
  • [7] Arnott Richard, 1989, J REAL ESTATE FINANC, V2, P5
  • [8] Borsch-Supan A., 1986, J INST THEOR ECON, V142, P380
  • [9] CARD D, 1994, IN PRESS AM EC REV
  • [10] COLEMAN D, 1988, J REAL ESTATE FINANC, V1, P233, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF00658919