Influence of N-acetylcysteine on chronic bronchitis or COPD exacerbations: a meta-analysis

被引:231
作者
Cazzola, Mario [1 ]
Calzetta, Luigino [1 ]
Page, Clive [2 ]
Jardim, Jose [3 ]
Chuchalin, Alexander G. [4 ]
Rogliani, Paola [1 ]
Matera, Maria Gabriella [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Roma Tor Vergata, Dept Syst Med, Rome, Italy
[2] Kings Coll London, Inst Pharmaceut Sci, Sackler Inst Pulm Pharmacol, London, England
[3] Univ Fed Sao Paulo, Escola Paulista Med, Resp Dis, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[4] Fed Med & Biol Agcy, Inst Pulmonol, Moscow, Russia
[5] Univ Naples 2, Dept Expt Med, Naples, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.1183/16000617.00002215
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
In order to clarify the possible role of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) in the treatment of patients with chronic bronchitis and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), we have carried out a metaanalysis testing the available evidence that NAC treatment may be effective in preventing exacerbations of chronic bronchitis or COPD and evaluating whether there is a substantial difference between the responses induced by low (<= 600 mg per day) and high (> 600 mg per day) doses of NAC. The results of the present meta-analysis (13 studies, 4155 COPD patients, NAC n= 1933; placebo or controls n= 2222) showed that patients treated with NAC had significantly and consistently fewer exacerbations of chronic bronchitis or COPD (relative risk 0.75, 95% CI 0.66-0.84; p < 0.01), although this protective effect was more apparent in patients without evidence of airway obstruction. However, high doses of NAC were also effective in patients suffering from COPD diagnosed using spirometric criteria (relative risk 0.75, 95% CI 0.68-0.82; p= 0.04). NAC was well tolerated and the risk of adverse reactions was not dose-dependent (low doses relative risk 0.93, 95% CI 0.89-0.97; p= 0.40; high doses relative risk 1.11, 95% CI 0.89-1.39; p= 0.58). The strong signal that comes from this meta-analysis leads us to state that if a patient suffering from chronic bronchitis presents a documented airway obstruction, NAC should be administered at a dose of. 1200 mg per day to prevent exacerbations, while if a patient suffers from chronic bronchitis, but is without airway obstruction, a regular treatment of 600 mg per day seems to be sufficient.
引用
收藏
页码:451 / 461
页数:11
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]
Bachh AA, 2007, JK PRACTITIONER, V14, P12
[2]
BOMAN G, 1983, EUR J RESPIR DIS, V64, P405
[3]
Borenstein M, 2009, INTRO METAANALYSIS
[4]
N-acetylcysteine in COPD may be beneficial, but for whom? [J].
Cazzola, Mario ;
Matera, Maria Gabriella .
LANCET RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2014, 2 (03) :166-167
[5]
Standards for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with COPD: a summary of the ATS/ERS position paper [J].
Celli, BR ;
MacNee, W ;
Agusti, A ;
Anzueto, A ;
Berg, B ;
Buist, AS ;
Calverley, PMA ;
Chavannes, N ;
Dillard, T ;
Fahy, B ;
Fein, A ;
Heffner, J ;
Lareau, S ;
Meek, P ;
Martinez, F ;
McNicholas, W ;
Muris, J ;
Austegard, E ;
Pauwels, R ;
Rennard, S ;
Rossi, A ;
Siafakas, N ;
Tiep, B ;
Vestbo, J ;
Wouters, E ;
ZuWallack, R .
EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2004, 23 (06) :932-946
[6]
Criner GJ, 2015, CHEST, V147, P883, DOI 10.1378/chest.14-1677
[7]
DeCoster J., META ANAL NOTES
[8]
Effects of N-acetylcysteine on outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (Bronchitis Randomized on NAC Cost-Utility Study, BRONCUS):: a randomised placebo-controlled trial [J].
Decramer, M ;
Rutten-van Mölken, M ;
Dekhuijzen, PNR ;
Troosters, T ;
van Herwaarden, C ;
Pellegrino, R ;
van Schayck, CPO ;
Olivieri, D ;
Del Donno, M ;
De Backer, W ;
Lankhorst, I ;
Ardia, A .
LANCET, 2005, 365 (9470) :1552-1560
[9]
N-acetylcysteine reduces the risk of re-hospitalisation among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [J].
Gerrits, CMJM ;
Herings, RMC ;
Leufkens, HGM ;
Lammers, JWJ .
EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2003, 21 (05) :795-798
[10]
Efficacy of oral long-term N-acetylcysteine in chronic bronchopulmonary disease:: A meta-analysis of published double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials [J].
Grandjean, EM ;
Berthet, P ;
Ruffmann, R ;
Leuenberger, P .
CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2000, 22 (02) :209-221