SCALE, VARIABLE DENSITY, AND CONSERVATION PLANNING FOR MAMMALIAN CARNIVORES

被引:52
作者
SCHONEWALDCOX, C
AZARI, R
BLUME, S
机构
[1] Cooperative Unit, National Park Service, Institute of Ecology, Division of Environmental Studies, University of California, Davis, California
[2] Division of Statistics University of California, Davis, California
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1523-1739.1991.tb00356.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Many mammalian carnivores are in local or global decline. To slow this process, continued planning to protect these species is warranted. Still, the data bases that we have at our disposal do not adequately document population requirements for space at scales appropriate for conservation planning. To illustrate this problem, we have collected published data for 214 population censuses of carnivores. We tested for a relationship between the number of individuals censused and the size of study site for our entire data set. We conducted the same test for each family, for which we obtained sufficient and qualifying census data. With areas ranging from less than 10 km2 to over 40,000 km2, we obtained a significant regression (p < .001; r2 = 76%) for the sample as a whole. We examined the distribution of densities with increasing area and found that the relationship was not constant but decreased. We noticed that numbers per census-area size increased with a slope (m < 1). We also noticed that the sizes of study areas were unevenly distributed. Only 7% of the studies in our sample censused regions larger than 10,000 km2. It remains unclear to what extent and how the density decreases with increasing scale. We expect that extrapolations from small scales to larger ones are likely to underestimate space requirements for carnivores.
引用
收藏
页码:491 / 495
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Ballard W.B., Whitman J.S., Gardner C.L., Ecology of an exploited wolf population in south‐central Alaska, Wildlife Monographs, 93, pp. 1-54, (1987)
  • [2] Clutton-Brock T.H., Harvey P.H., The functional significance of variation in body size among mammals, Advances in the study of mammalian behavior, pp. 632-663, (1983)
  • [3] Fuller T.K., Keith L.B., Wolf population dynamics and prey relationships in northeastern Alberta, The Journal of Wildlife Management, 44, 3, pp. 583-602, (1980)
  • [4] Furnell D.J., Schweinsburg R.E., Population dynamics of central Canadian arctic island polar bears, Journal of Wildlife Management, 48, 3, pp. 722-728, (1984)
  • [5] Gasaway W.C., Stephenson R.O., Davis J.L, Shepherd P.E.K., Burris O.E., Interrelationships of wolves, prey, and man in interior Alaska, Wildlife Monographs, 84, pp. 1-50, (1983)
  • [6] Gittleman J.L., Harvey P.H., Carnivore home range size: metabolic needs and ecology, Behavioral Ecological Sociobiology, 10, pp. 57-63, (1982)
  • [7] Carnivore behavior, ecology, and evolution, (1989)
  • [8] Harris L.D., The fragmented forest island biogeography theory and the preservation of biotic diversity, (1984)
  • [9] Harris L.D., Eisenberg J.F., Enhanced linkages: necessary steps for success in conservation of faunal diversity, Conservation for the twenty‐first century, pp. 166-181, (1989)
  • [10] Kruuk H.H., The spotted hyena: a study of predation and social behavior, (1972)