THE DOSE-RESPONSE SLOPE - A USEFUL METHOD FOR EXPRESSING THE RESULTS OF METHACHOLINE PROVOCATION TESTS IN HEALTHY-SUBJECTS

被引:16
作者
SEPPALA, OP
机构
[1] Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Turku, Turku, SF-20520
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0954-6111(06)80179-4
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
In order to study the reproducibility of different indices of airway responsiveness, two bronchial provocations with increasing methacholine concentrations up to 256 mg ml−1 were performed within 2 weeks on 30 healthy volunteers. The dose-response slope [DRS = maximal fall (%) in pulmonary function/maximal non-cumulative methacholine dose (μmol)] was calculated from forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and from area under the expiratory flow-volume curve (AEFV). DRS reproducibility within 2 weeks in responsive (decline in FEV1 > 20%) and non-responsive subjects (decline in FEV1 < 20%) was assessed. After log-transformation of the data the reproducibility was assessed with intraclass correlations (ICC) [with 95% confidence intervals (CIicc)], mean difference with limits of agreement (δ±sd), 95% confidence intervals for a single measurement (CIsm), and the absolute difference of the observations of the two days from each other (zero = ideal reproducibility). Provocative doses (PD20FEV1) could be calculated for 14 subjects on both occasions. In this responsive group the reproducibility of all the parameters used (PD20FEV1, DRSFEV and DRSAEFV) was high. In the nonresponsive group, DRSFEV demonstrated a slightly, but not clearly, lower ICC than DRSAEFV. However, DRSFEV had clearly wider limits of agreement and CIsm than DRSAEFV. Also, with DRSFEV the observations of the two days differed significantly more from each other than with DRSAEFV (P<0·05). © 1991, Baillière Tindall All rights reserved. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:365 / 371
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   ANALYSIS OF DOSE-RESPONSE CURVES IN THE DETECTION OF BRONCHIAL HYPERREACTIVITY [J].
BELLIA, V ;
RIZZO, A ;
AMOROSO, S ;
MIRABELLA, A ;
BONSIGNORE, G .
RESPIRATION, 1983, 44 (01) :10-18
[2]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[3]  
BRUSCHI C, 1989, EUR RESPIR J, V2, P630
[4]   DESCRIPTIVE EPIDEMIOLOGY OF BRONCHIAL REACTIVITY IN AN ADULT-POPULATION - RESULTS FROM A COMMUNITY STUDY [J].
BURNEY, PGJ ;
BRITTON, JR ;
CHINN, S ;
TATTERSFIELD, AE ;
PAPACOSTA, AO ;
KELSON, MC ;
ANDERSON, F ;
CORFIELD, DR .
THORAX, 1987, 42 (01) :38-44
[5]   STANDARDIZATION OF BRONCHIAL INHALATION CHALLENGE PROCEDURES [J].
CHAI, H ;
FARR, RS ;
FROEHLICH, LA ;
MATHISON, DA ;
MCLEAN, JA ;
ROSENTHAL, RR ;
SHEFFER, AL ;
SPECTOR, SL ;
TOWNLEY, RG .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1975, 56 (04) :323-327
[6]   INTRASUBJECT VARIABILITY OF MAXIMAL EXPIRATORY FLOW VOLUME CURVE [J].
COCHRANE, GM ;
PRIETO, F ;
CLARK, TJH .
THORAX, 1977, 32 (02) :171-176
[7]   UNIMODAL DISTRIBUTION OF BRONCHIAL RESPONSIVENESS TO INHALED HISTAMINE IN A RANDOM HUMAN-POPULATION [J].
COCKCROFT, DW ;
BERSCHEID, BA ;
MURDOCK, KY .
CHEST, 1983, 83 (05) :751-754
[8]   HISTAMINE DOSE-RESPONSE CURVES IN ASTHMA - REPRODUCIBILITY AND SENSITIVITY OF DIFFERENT INDEXES TO ASSESS RESPONSE [J].
DEHAUT, P ;
RACHIELE, A ;
MARTIN, RR ;
MALO, JL .
THORAX, 1983, 38 (07) :516-522
[9]   A COMPARISON OF CONFIDENCE-INTERVAL METHODS FOR THE INTRACLASS CORRELATION-COEFFICIENT [J].
DONNER, A ;
WELLS, G .
BIOMETRICS, 1986, 42 (02) :401-412
[10]  
Fleiss J. L., 1986, RELIABILITY MEASUREM