THE CASE FOR PERFORMANCE MONITORING

被引:110
作者
WHOLEY, JS [1 ]
HATRY, HP [1 ]
机构
[1] URBAN INST,STATE LOCAL GOVT RES PROGRAM,WASHINGTON,DC 20037
关键词
D O I
10.2307/977173
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
Is performance monitoring in public programs feasible and worthwhile? Joseph S. Wholey and Harry P. Hatry argue that it is and support their thesis with examples from a range of national, state, and local governments. After addressing some of the barriers to effective Performance monitoring, they call for actions that would increase its use at all levels of government.
引用
收藏
页码:604 / 610
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
AFFHOLTER D, 1991, OUTCOME EVALUATION P
[2]  
BARNOW BS, 1992, EVALUATING WELFARE AND TRAINING PROGRAMS, P277
[3]  
CARTER R, 1983, ACCOUNTABLE AGENCY
[4]  
DEMING W, 1986, OURT CRISIS
[5]  
DICKINSON KP, 1988, EVALUATION EFFECTS J
[6]  
*FL DEP HLTH REH S, 1991, OUTC EV REP CHILDR Y
[7]  
GOERTZ ME, 1989, NOV ASS PUBL POL AN
[8]  
HARTY HP, 1989, SERVICE EFFORTS ACOM
[9]  
HARTY HP, 1990, SERVICE EFFORTS ACCO
[10]  
Levitt M. S., 1987, GROWTH EFFICIENCY PU