REIMBURSEMENT PATTERNS IN A HOSPITAL-BASED FIXED-WING AEROMEDICAL SERVICE

被引:1
作者
LINDBECK, GH
机构
[1] Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville, VA
关键词
AEROMEDICAL; EM; REIMBURSEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/0735-6757(93)90006-W
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Reimbursement, expressed as a percentage of total charges recovered, was examined for inpatients transported by a university hospital-based, dedicated, fixed-wing aeromedical service between July 1, 1988 and June 30, 1990. A total of 410 patients were transported; account information was available for 404 patients (98%). Patients transported from in-state institutions (n = 174) had a hospital reimbursement rate of 53.3%, whereas the flight program recovered 46.1% of transportation charges. Patients transported from out-of-state institutions (n = 150) had a hospital reimbursement rate of 51.3%, whereas the flight program recovered 69.3% of charges. More patients referred from in-state sources were covered by Medicaid than from out-of-state sources (31% vs 11%), and less were covered by Medicare (17% vs 30%). Reimbursement for hospital charges was low for patients covered by Medicaid (44% for in-state and 16% for out-of-state), and Medicaid reimbursed no flight charges for either in-state or out-of-state patients. The flight program recovered 86.7% of charges for "triangle" flights, which transported patients between two hospitals other than the sponsoring institution (n = 80). The overall hospital reimbursement rate for inpatients was 70% during the study period. The flight program recovered 53.7% of its operating costs from payment of charges for transport services. Aeromedically transported patients may represent a financial "high-risk" group of patients for the sponsoring institution. © 1993.
引用
收藏
页码:586 / 589
页数:4
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
Lake, Financial realities, are aeromedical services in a fight to lose money?, J Emerg Med Serv, pp. 40-41, (1985)
[2]  
Sakrison, J Emerg Med Serv, To fly or not to fly? The economics of hospital-based helicopter programs, pp. 43-50, (1986)
[3]  
Are Helicopters Worth the Cost?, Cost Containment Newsletter, 6, 7, pp. 2-6, (1984)
[4]  
Moylan, Fitzpatrick, Beyer, Et al., Factors improving survival in multisystem trauma patients, Ann Surg, 207, 6, pp. 679-685, (1988)
[5]  
Rhee, O'Malley, Turner, Et al., Does a helicopter service stimulate financially motivated transfers?, West J Med, 147, pp. 487-488, (1987)
[6]  
Thomas, Larsen, Clemmer, Et al., Impact of prospective payments on a tertiary care center receiving large numbers of critically ill patients by aeromedical transport, Crit Care Med, 14, 3, pp. 227-230, (1986)
[7]  
Thomas, Fox, Clemmer, Et al., The financial impact of medicare diagnosis-related groups: Effect upon hospitals receiving cardiac patients referred for tertiary care, Chest, 91, 3, pp. 418-423, (1987)
[8]  
Thomas, Clemmer, Larsen, Et al., The economic impact of DRG payment policies on air-evacuated trauma patients, J Trauma, 28, 4, pp. 446-452, (1988)
[9]  
Saywell, Woods, Rodman, Et al., Financial analysis of an inner-city helicopter service: Charges versus collections, ann Emerg Med, 18, pp. 21-25, (1989)
[10]  
Woods, Saywell, Rodman, Et al., Financial analysis of an inner-city helicopter service: Charges versus collections for patients transferred from another acute care facility, Ann Emerg Med, 18, pp. 1240-1243, (1989)