INFLUENCES OF TREES ON SAVANNA PRODUCTIVITY - TESTS OF SHADE, NUTRIENTS, AND TREE-GRASS COMPETITION

To determine why herbaceous productivity in tropical and subtropical savannas is often significantly higher under crowns of isolated trees than in adjacent grasslands, experimental plots were established in three concentric zones, crown, tree-root, and grassland, surrounding isolated trees of Acacia tortilis in low-rainfall and high-rainfall savannas in Tsavo National Park, Kenya. Plots were fertilized (to determine the importance of nutrient enrichment by trees), shaded (to determine the importance of crown shade), fertilized and shaded (to identify fertilizer x shade interactions), or trenched (tree roots entering plots were severed to determine the importance of belowground competition between overstory trees and understory herbaceous plants). In addition, vertical root distributions of trees and herbaceous species were determined, and root systems of A. tortilis saplings were excavated. At both sites fertilization significantly increased herbaceous productivity in tree-root and grassland zones, but not in canopy zones; artificial shade had no effect on productivity at the low-rainfall site but increased productivity in the tree-root zone at the high-rainfall site; and severing tree roots had no effect on herbaceous productivity at the low-rainfall site, but increased productivity in the crown and tree-root zones at the high-rainfall site. Roots of herbaceous and woody species co-occurred within the same soil horizons, but tree roots extended farther into grasslands at the low-rainfall site than at the high-rainfall site. These studies suggest that savanna trees competed more intensely with understory plants at wetter sites, where their roots terminated in or near crown zones, than at drier sites, where their roots extended farther into open grassland. Nutrients added by trees to crown zones in the form of tree litter and animal droppings increased understory productivity by fertilizing nutrient-limited soils. Shade contributed more to regrowth after severe defoliation than to growth under more normal conditions.