PREDICTORS OF INTRACRANIAL INJURY IN PATIENTS WITH MILD HEAD TRAUMA

被引:152
作者
BORCZUK, P
机构
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0196-0644(95)70199-0
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Study objective: To determine the prevalence of abnormal computed tomography (CT) scans and define high-risk clinical variables in patients with mild head injury. Design: Retrospective descriptive study of patients with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores of 13 or greater who presented to the emergency department with blunt head trauma and who underwent cranial CT. Setting: Level 1 trauma center, university ED. Results: During the 15-month study period, 1,448 patients underwent CT scanning for mild head injury. Abnormalities resulting from the trauma were found in 119(8.2%), and 11 patients(.76%) required neurosurgical intervention. Patients with higher GCS scores had a greater chance of having a solitary CT abnormality (P=004). Bicyclists and pedestrians struck by cars were more likely than others to sustain intracranial injury. High-risk clinical variables included the presence of cranial soft-tissue injury, a focal neurologic deficit, signs of basilar skull fracture and age older than 60 years. A strategy using those variables had a sensitivity of 98.6% and a specificity of 46.2% for detecting a CT abnormality. None of the patients missed by this strategy required medical or neurosurgical management for the CT finding. Conclusion: Abnormalities on CT scans in patients with mild head trauma are fairly common, although the need for neurosurgical intervention is rare. Clinical decision rules can be used to identify those patients with more serious intracranial pathology. Such strategies should be validated prospectively in various ED settings.
引用
收藏
页码:731 / 736
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
Vollmer, Dacy, The management of mild and moderate head injuries, Neurosurg Clin North Am, 2, pp. 437-455, (1991)
[2]  
Cook, Levitt, Simon, Et al., Identification of ethanol-intoxicated patients with minor head trauma requiring computed tomography scans, Acad Emerg Med, 1, pp. 227-234, (1994)
[3]  
Stein, Ross, The value of computerized tomographic scans in patients with low risk head injuries, Neurosurgery, 26, pp. 638-640, (1990)
[4]  
Harad, Kerstein, Inadequacy of bedside clinical indicators in identifying intracranial injury in head trauma patients, J Trauma, 32, pp. 359-363, (1992)
[5]  
Mohanty, Thompson, Rakower, Are CT scans for head injury patients always necessary?, J Trauma, 31, pp. 801-805, (1991)
[6]  
Taheri, Karamanoukian, Gibbons, Et al., Can patients with minor head injuries be safely discharged home?, Arch Surg, 128, pp. 289-292, (1993)
[7]  
Feuerman, Wackym, Gade, Et al., Value of skull radiography, head computerized tomographic scanning and admission for observation in cases of minor head injury, Neurosurgery, 22, pp. 449-453, (1988)
[8]  
Masters, McClean, Arcarese, Et al., Skull x-ray examination after head trauma: Recommendations by a multidisciplinary panel and validation study, N Engl J Med, 316, pp. 84-92, (1987)
[9]  
Klauber, Marshall, Luerson, Et al., Determinants of head injury mortality: Importance of the low-risk patient, Neurosurgery, 24, pp. 31-36, (1989)
[10]  
Marshall, Toole, Bowers, The national traumatic coma data bank. 2. Patients who talk and deteriorate: Implications for treatment, J Neurosurg, 59, pp. 285-288, (1983)